View Single Post
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 28-09-2006, 11:22 PM in reply to flanflinger's post starting "Two thoughts 1. It proves that Inzi..."
Mike's Avatar
Mike Mike is offline
Administrator
WAT selector - England A 2005
WAT Journalist  Read my Articles
(ENG-captain) Passed W.G. Grace's 1098 Test runs
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sydney, Australia
My main national team: Australia
My other team/s: England
Posts: 1,119
Send a message via Yahoo to Mike
I've added a poll to this thread because I'm wondering which charge is actually the more serious. Some sources say the charge of ball-tampering is more serious but why? Which do you think is more serious? This is a public poll.

Bear in mind that the penalty for bringing the game into disrepute is a maximum ban of four to eight ODIs or two to four Tests.

However, the penalty for ball-tampering is 5 runs!

Last edited by Mike : 28-09-2006 at 11:26 PM.
Reply With Quote