View Single Post
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 29-09-2006, 01:06 PM in reply to Mike's post starting "Obviously the ball-tampering law wasn't..."
darksideofthemoon's Avatar
darksideofthemoon darksideofthemoon is offline
WAT selector - England A 2005
(WI) Passed Michael Holding's 910 Test runs
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: London
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Lancs, England A Team
Posts: 911
It should have been a 4 Test ban for causing the Test to be stopped. Why 4 internationals? Inzi has done nothing wrong in internationals.
Ball tampering - only the ball tamperer should be charged. No ball tamperer - change the ball and get on with the game. Forget penalty runs.
Reply With Quote