View Single Post
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 05-10-2006, 07:58 PM in reply to Statto's post starting "Youve picked 12 players anyway. The..."
Andy Mellon's Avatar
Andy Mellon Andy Mellon is offline
Moderator
WAT selector - England A 2005
WAT New Zealand A Selector
WAT Journalist  Read my Articles
(NZ-captain) Passed Ken Rutherford's 2465 Test runs
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Wellington, NZ
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Essex and New Zealand
Posts: 2,477
Send a message via Yahoo to Andy Mellon
Quote:
Originally Posted by Statto
Youve picked 12 players anyway.
Gah! That'll just make them even tougher to beat on the world stage

Or maybe they'd compete in those pointless 12-a-side games that get played as warm ups these days.

Or maybe I made a mistake

I have gone for selecting the best team in general conditions. I.e. if the pitch had no bearing on the decision, who are the best players to make up

6 batsmen, 1 keeper, 1 allrounder, 1 spinner, 2 other bowlers

To answer the curious, i think to get my *11* I would drop Morton to drinks carrier and hope that he didn't get too upset with the decision

As for Sittingduck's question on eligibility - I'm not sure myself. The guys who've now exceeded 5 tests were selected for their respective A Teams, so it seems a bit unfair to exclude them, but they have breached the qualification criteria. I guess this would only apply to Hachim Amla and Jerome Taylor??

Last edited by Andy Mellon : 05-10-2006 at 08:02 PM.
Reply With Quote