Thread: The accidental tourists
View Single Post
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 28-11-2006, 09:10 AM in reply to Rachael's post starting "I'd say Giles bowled better than Warne:..."
Mr Hutt's Avatar
Mr Hutt Mr Hutt is offline
Slightly Nuts & Lovin it
WAT Journalist  Read my Articles
(ENG) Passed Eddie Paynter's 1540 Test runs
  
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Karachi/Pakistan
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
Posts: 1,524
Send a message via MSN to Mr Hutt Send a message via Yahoo to Mr Hutt
well Giles certainly didnt strike as much as warne even if he was bowling long hops... he ripped through some english batting in the second innings.

First innings Giles took 1 wicket... when he was needed the most he failed... 2nd innings well he didnt take anything

Warne took nothing in the first innings in the second he took 4 wickets when he was needed the most... true he gave 134 runs.. but then Australia were not really concerned about runs they needed wickets and warne delivered.
Last edited by Mr Hutt : 28-11-2006 at 09:14 AM.
Reply With Quote