Thread: Nixon & Foster
View Single Post
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 03-01-2007, 05:56 PM in reply to Roland Pink's post starting "The England selectors have obviously..."
pie_chucker's Avatar
pie_chucker pie_chucker is offline
Moderator
Selector-World XI (1980 onwards)
(SA) Passed Colin Bland's 1669 Test runs
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Northumberland, England
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Durham, Newcastle United
Posts: 1,694
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roland Pink

For reasons unknown the England selectors have consistently been poor in preparing a consistent one-day team for the future. I personally think that the problem is in our approach of playing ‘bit’ players who can bat a little and bowl a little. If we play a team as close to the test team then we will perform better. One-day cricket is not necessary all about all-rounders, as important as they are.
Exactly, why have 2 players who can score 20 odd and bowl 10 overs between them for 50 runs when you could play a genuine batsman who could potentially score 100 when the pressures on and a proper bowler who has control under pressure! We are the only "major" team who persists in bits and pieces players, thats we we are so c**p! - Think back to last summer v Sri Lanka.

Looking at the keeping postion long term (beyond next summer) I think will be the end of Jones and Read (thankfully), Jones isnt good enoughwith bat or gloves and Read isnt good enough with the bat. James Foster might get his long awaited recall! Unfortunately, Rachael, the days of picking a specialist keeper are long gone, no matter how good he is. If your keeper cant average 30 then he will struggle to get a game in ANY test side.
__________________
Mark.
Reply With Quote