Thread: Nixon & Foster
View Single Post
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 03-01-2007, 08:05 PM in reply to Speedboy Salesman's post starting "Is this going to be a long term problem..."
pie_chucker's Avatar
pie_chucker pie_chucker is offline
Moderator
Selector-World XI (1980 onwards)
(SA) Passed Colin Bland's 1669 Test runs
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Northumberland, England
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Durham, Newcastle United
Posts: 1,694
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rachael
If your keeper generally comes in after the top order has seen off the second new ball (as Gilchrist has routinely been able to do) then pretty much any tom, dick or harry could be taught to bat well enough for a Test side: in most Tests it ain't THAT difficult.... something borne out by the improvement over their careers of Warne, Lee, Gillespie and McGrath, of Giles and Hoggard and of one Mark Richardson (from no 11 bat to opener).
Perhaps it isnt that difficult, but the test of a player is that he scores runs when the pressures on, a la Steve Waugh - Aussies 25/5 He scores a ton. Aussie 400/5 he scores a 30.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rachael
What's needed from ALL the lower order is application: some will do better than others... and every once in a while the side is going to end up going from 5-out to all-out pretty quickly no matter WHO plays... but let's not hide from the need for the top order to bat through the better part of four sessions.
This will happen to all sides but to be a good side you do need to bat to 9 (and have a top 6 that regulary fires)


Quote:
Originally Posted by Rachael
Bottom line: if you win the toss and bat first and your batsman is at the crease inside the first few minutes of day two... then no matter who is in your lower order... they are going to achieve a lot less than if they take over nearer lunchtime!
Common sense, big first innings scores, usually win games.
__________________
Mark.
Reply With Quote