View Single Post
  #78 (permalink)  
Old 20-01-2007, 01:57 AM in reply to Ernest's post starting "Had Australia batted first then there..."
Seamer Seamer is offline
(SA) Passed John Waite's 2405 Test runs
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
Posts: 2,436
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ernest
Had Australia batted first then there might have been some credibility to your post, but England made a small total, and this was probably Flintoff's best match as captain..
The 7-1 win/loss ratio is what gives my post credibility. England had a good match mainly due to some very good bowling form Anderson (remember him? - one of the guys wh took the blame for the Ashes loss) not because of Flintoff captaincy attempt.
__________________

Reply With Quote