View Single Post
  #85 (permalink)  
Old 20-01-2007, 05:37 PM in reply to Ernest's post starting "He still got wickets Rachael - and..."
Rachael Rachael is online now
Administrator
WAT selector
Selector-World XI (1980 onwards)
(ENG-captain) Passed Mike Atherton's 7728 Test runs
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Norfolk
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
Posts: 7,933
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ernest
Most captains don't bother about a bowler going for runs, so long as he gets wickets, that was a commentator on TMS during England last match.
Most bowlers who get wickets don't go for runs: sure, there's a difference between a bowler like McGrath who builds pressure by keeping it tight and a bowler like Donald who built pressure by always looking likely to take wickets... but for all that Donald would serve up the odd loose delivery and present scoring opportunities... he still ended his career with an economy rate of 2.83!

Sure... if a bowler is consistently beating the bat you don't mind the odd boundary... but that still needs to be within reason: 5/155 off 25 overs in a low scoring game is likely to concede the match in a way that 3/60 off 25 overs will not!

To compound matters... 5/155 one week could easily be 2/155 another week.... which is catastrophic... but 3/55 one week becoming 1/60 the next means the bowler has still done his job.

On those two weeks combined... the "strike bowler" ends with a wicket every 50 balls... and the "tight bowler" ends with a wicket every 75 balls... but the former ends with an average of 51.67 and an economy rate of 6.2 whilst the latter ends with an average of 30 and an economy rate of 2.4!
Reply With Quote