View Single Post
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 26-01-2007, 10:26 AM in reply to cantplaycantalk's post "England ODI team - Pitiful or..."
Rachael Rachael is offline
Administrator
WAT selector
Selector-World XI (1980 onwards)
(ENG-captain) Passed Mike Atherton's 7728 Test runs
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Norfolk
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
Posts: 7,935
Quote:
Originally Posted by cantplaycantalk
Pitifull? Embarresing? Humiliating? Pathetic?
How about "promising"? Sure, Strauss and Collingwood have lost form... but we knew that before this game and form can come back as quickly as it goes if a player can just be given a break... but Bell apparently played beautifully.. and with Bell and Joyce at the crease and the score at 70/2 off 15 overs the game was off to an excellent start.

Flintoff's been in good nick lately, DAlrymple was out to a superb delivery and none of the others who batted are any more than fringe players anyway! Flintoff then returned 3-1-4-0... Tremlett did even better, doing enough to nail his place in the WI... Dalrymple did no wrong.. and Panesar showed that he should also be in the final squad.

So what if Loye, Nixon and Plunkett bombed: they are ODI novices who probably shouldn't be in Australia anyway!

Last edited by Rachael : 26-01-2007 at 10:28 AM.
Reply With Quote