View Single Post
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 27-01-2007, 11:09 AM in reply to Ninjaman's post starting "Ah, back to criticising Matthew..."
Rachael Rachael is offline
Administrator
WAT selector
Selector-World XI (1980 onwards)
(ENG-captain) Passed Mike Atherton's 7728 Test runs
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Norfolk
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
Posts: 7,934
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ninjaman
If an acknowledgement of a lack of form can be extended to Strauss, why not Hayden too?
I was merely responding to Greg's suggestion that "An out of form Hayden is still better than anything we have up top": that's not to deny Hayden's in-form prowess as a ODI batsman... but it puts in perspective all the wittering about England's squad.

If Hayden, despite all the competition from great Aussie batsmen, can retain a place in the all-conquering Aussie side whilst performing at the same level as Vaughan and Strauss... the notion that a similarly-performing Vaughan and Strauss should be axed seems a little off.

That's all incidental though: I was more interested in hearing Aussie perspectives on Chappell's comment.
Reply With Quote