There have been some interesting public statements from the England Camp this week.

Fletcher claimed Panesar was the "Second Spinner" with Dalrymple being the major player. While Vaughan (after the game) claimed Monty could be the key factor in England doing well at the World Cup.

Now I know what most of you guys will be thinking, and I am of the same opinion. But surely Fletcher cannot be as blinkered as we like to think when it comes to Monty. Was Fletcher playing mind games, or is it his actual opinion?

http://content-uk.cricinfo.com/wc200...ry/284732.html
http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/sport/...ies/article.do