View Single Post
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 10-03-2007, 11:17 AM in reply to Rachael's post starting "Today's Torygraph report on yesterday's..."
flanflinger's Avatar
flanflinger flanflinger is offline
WAT England A Selector-2005
WAT Journalist  Read my Articles
(WI) Passed Everton Weekes' 4455 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Bristol
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Surrey and the Mighty Mighty Quinns
Posts: 4,475
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rachael
Today's Torygraph report on yesterday's ODI noted that Monty came on as 6th change.
But when he did come on he was by far the best bowler on show (from an England point of view). Maybe they went into the game with an attack in mind, but some players (Lewis, Plunkett and in Australia's case Johnson) may have played themselves out of contention while others (Panesar and again in Aus's case Clark) may have made a very case.

Vaughan was always likely to leave the field early, and Flintoff was forced off, so it may have been the plan to get Monty on at that stage, and it just happened to be when Collingwood was in charge.

For me the big decision, and the one we are nowhere near settling, is who opens with Anderson, as none of the candidates covered themselves in glory.

Last edited by flanflinger : 10-03-2007 at 12:09 PM.
Reply With Quote