i too would pick plunkett over lewis only because lewis will get no assitance from the pitch an due to his slow natural will be much more liable to go for runs whereas plunket has pace and bounce, though also can be quiet expensive so i dont think either will be ugh succces this world cup, where is stuart broad, he should be gaining valuble experiance in a tornement like this, surley he should have beenn brought in over lewis, my team for the game against new zeland
vaughan
bell- deffently good enough to open
pietersen- get him in early as possible
joyce-KEPPER lets try him in the middle order could be more effective against an older ball an cant be much worse than nixon with the gloves, with a bit of work
strauss- has showed ability to make runs in this position, much morw effective in the middle order9 showed it late in the comwealth series)
collingwood- good finisher
flintoff- the later for flintoff the better for england much more effective in the last 10 overs wher there is no pressure
bopara- beter bat than dalrymple and could be far more economical then dalrymple's right arm dobbers
plunket- potential match winner wicket taker and useful to bat lower down in the last 5 overs
anderson- opening bowler swing bowler an can be a wicket taker regualrly
panasar- if he slows down and gives it slightly more flight then really could be dangerous though regardless of flight very economical
I CAN DREAM CAN'T I
