Thread: MCC vs Sussex
View Single Post
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 13-04-2007, 09:26 PM in reply to adamberry's post starting "Possibly the fact he's been reported..."
pie_chucker's Avatar
pie_chucker pie_chucker is offline
Moderator
Selector-World XI (1980 onwards)
(SA) Passed Colin Bland's 1669 Test runs
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Northumberland, England
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Durham, Newcastle United
Posts: 1,686
To be honest I've never seen Kirtley as being anywhere near international class. On the dry flat wickets we tend to play on nowadays he would be a "pie chucker" . He lacks the pace to trouble good batsman on flat decks. Also his action still isnt the greatest.

If we were to play all our matches on a damp may morning on an overcast old fashioned Headingley wicket then yes, I'd advocate his selection.

We are going back to the county stalwarts again. Why not recall Adams, Kirtley, Ramps, Caddick...... and then lose both series this summer that we are very likely to win comfortably.

I would only advocate these backward selections if they are better than anything that we have and Kirtley would be at least 10th on the list of pace bowlers.
__________________
Mark.
Reply With Quote