View Single Post
  #39 (permalink)  
Old 17-05-2007, 09:06 PM in reply to Ernest's post starting "No for political reasons I can't stand..."
flanflinger's Avatar
flanflinger flanflinger is offline
WAT England A Selector-2005
WAT Journalist  Read my Articles
(AUS-captain) Passed Kim Hughes' 4415 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Bristol
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Surrey and the Mighty Mighty Quinns
Posts: 4,450
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ernest
N would England be better off playing a player other than Bell (England need a sticket like Butcher/Thorpe)
But Ern, Bell is a sticker like Thorpe and Butcher (I would say Butch started off as a flamboyant opener and adapted)..

You have written a guy off at just 25, with a Test average of over 40.. you have never come up with a reason why apart from:-

1. He hasn't done it in the Ashes - well neither did a generation of English players throughout the 90's!! Despite the fact that he was of the most consistent batters during the Ashes.
2. You think he has a problem with pace - yet scored a hundred against Pakistan with Akhtar playing (the quickest bowler in the world) http://www.cricinfo.com/db/ARCHIVE/2...24NOV2005.html

If you can name another sub-30 player with a Test average of over 40, and more than five Test hundreds - who is not in the Test team, and could bat in place of Bell - then I will back you all the way...
Reply With Quote