View Single Post
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 14-10-2007, 09:59 AM in reply to greg's post starting "Personally Rashid should be in this..."
Rachael Rachael is offline
Administrator
WAT selector
Selector-World XI (1980 onwards)
(AUS) Passed Justin Langer's 7696 Test runs
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Norfolk
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
Posts: 7,726
Quote:
Originally Posted by greg View Post
My choices would be Broad,Tremlett,Kabir Ali and Swann.
Mine to... but I'd also include Rashid (either at 6 or or at 7).

If our "tail" were to be of batting muppets... a 21st century equivalent of Mullaly, Malcolm, Tuffers and Giddens... then that might be an issue... but Broad is a long term no 7 bat (albeit currently a potential Test no 8)... that Swann is a no 8 who could easily be a Test no 7... and that Tremlett would be more than capable of slotting in at 8 in the Test side (perhaps ahead of Hoggard, Harmison and Panesar).

Rashid brings a lot to the party... and with a batting average in the mid 40s as well as a stack of wickets to his name... he deserves to be penned in early.
Reply With Quote