View Single Post
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 19-12-2007, 12:05 AM in reply to Gremlin's post starting "England had Stuart Broad match ready..."
Rachael Rachael is offline
Administrator
WAT selector
Selector-World XI (1980 onwards)
(ENG-captain) Passed Mike Atherton's 7728 Test runs
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Norfolk
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
Posts: 7,830
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gremlin View Post
It would be a big loss for England to have Hoggard miss out on the ideal bowling conditions of New Zealand just to risk him half fit on tricky wickets here.
In fairness... the ball was swinging as much in the morning session as any bowler could ever want: CMJ noted that Sidebottom was getting so much swing early on that he was finding it almost-impossible to control - he was just about unplayable at times. IN those conditions, Broad is of limited use: the alternative to Hoggard would have had to be Anderson, simply because he's a genuine swing bowler.

In fairness... Hoggard's fitness was more than adequate for bowling cutters, and in that mode he is very effective: Mike Selvey reckoned Hoggard was being a bit tentative with the new ball... but all concerned seemed agreed that Hoggard's second spell was excellent and seemed to be delivered without any obvious discomfort.
Reply With Quote