View Single Post
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 22-12-2007, 04:00 AM in reply to Rachael's post starting "I've no objection to arguments that..."
Aurelius Aurelius is offline
Selector-World XI (1980 onwards)
(ENG-captain) Passed W.G. Grace's 1098 Test runs
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Waterford, Perth, Australia
My main national team: West Indies
My other team/s: Australia, South Africa
Posts: 1,139
Quote:
The argument that ditching Ramps was right can be made (more coherently) without that argument.
How? You ditch players because they don't perform. How do you know that they don't perform? Looking at their stats. Ramprakash, as a top-order batsman, has an average roughly on the same lines as Daniel Vettori, Richard Hadlee or Shaun Pollock- not even close to being good enough.

Quote:
I continue to regard getting the most out of such talents as the principle responsibility of the coach: I don't doubt for one moment that a different coach could have got much, much more from Crawley, Ramps and Caddick back then... and from Bell, Read and Harmison more recently.
Perhaps, but ultimately it's the player's responsibilty to step up to the plate. Ramprakash couldn't do that, which is why he was dropped.
Reply With Quote