View Single Post
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 26-12-2007, 12:05 AM in reply to Mike's post starting "Rachael, do you think the modern bat..."
Rachael Rachael is offline
Administrator
WAT selector
Selector-World XI (1980 onwards)
(ENG-captain) Passed Mike Atherton's 7728 Test runs
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Norfolk
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
Posts: 7,835
That certainly doesn't help... but do you really think Gilchrist would have played the same way if he'd been facing Trueman on a greentop with the ball being swung both ways and seaming off the pitch? Moreover... whilst the ridiculous sweet spot would ensure edges had the legs to reach the boundary... do you think he could have controlled the direction and trajectory of the ball? I doubt he'd have survived long with ANY bat.

The modern batsman with a game perfectly suited to playing against that sort of bowling is Jayawardene... who gave a masterclass in battling that sort of bowling last time Sri Lanka toured England. I'm not sure what sort of bat he used... but I don't think it would have made much difference to him.

ps. The shortness of the grass on the outfield is just as bad as the modern bat: the days of fielders standing a chance of chasing a ball down are long gone.
Reply With Quote