View Single Post
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 07-01-2008, 10:40 PM in reply to EllN's post starting "You all talk of anderson in past tense..."
Ernest's Avatar
Ernest Ernest is offline
Administrator
WAT England A Selector
(WI-captain) Passed Brian Lara's 11953 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Lancashire
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
My other team/s: ::All "Test" Playing Nations
Posts: 13,524
Send a message via Yahoo to Ernest Send a message via Skype™ to Ernest
Quote:
Originally Posted by EllN View Post
You all talk of anderson in past tense or as cover,[...] but this is the same bowler who won man of the series against india, not least for how he made tendulkur his bunny. He has much more potential than sidebottom along with more pace, yes he may be bit wayward but so is harmison
No we don't all talk of Anderson in the past tense, look at my posts on Anderson - or those of darksideofthemoon.

Yes he is the same bowler that won the man of the match against India, but that counts for little to the morons that are the England selectors - remember Devon Malcolm who blew the South African batsmen away, only to find himself dropped at the earliest oppertunity.I think we can thus understand anyone talking about Anderson in the past tense if selections in the past are anything to go by.
Yes he has pace, yes he like Tait and Lee can be wayward - however Anderson is not a popular player with most England supporters, unless he can take 20 wickets in a match.

Same goes for Saj Mahmood, he can go for runs, but is far more potent that either Sidebottom or Broad will ever be, shame England don't have decent bowling coaches anymore.
__________________
Ern
Reply With Quote