View Single Post
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 28-02-2008, 11:34 AM in reply to Seamer's post starting "Yes i am disappointed. I would have..."
flanflinger's Avatar
flanflinger flanflinger is offline
WAT England A Selector-2005
WAT Journalist  Read my Articles
(AUS-captain) Passed Kim Hughes' 4415 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Bristol
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Surrey and the Mighty Mighty Quinns
Posts: 4,440
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seamer View Post
yet they still keep on winning, and you keep on retreating back into the wilderness.
Sorry been away from the site due to lack of Internet access!! Nothing more or less sinister than that... but am back now, to continue to predict that Australia's dominance is coming to an end...


Quote:
Originally Posted by Seamer View Post
P.S Clark and Symonds are superior options to "Monty", so at least we will still have the wood on you guys.
With the bat maybe... but with the ball?

Guess who time:-

Player A 19 games 22 wickets at 34.81 (no 4 wicket hauls let alone 5)
Player B 23 game 81 wickets at 32.76 (6 x 5w hauls and 1 x 10w)
Player C 33 game 12 wickets at 22 (1 x 5w haul)

The average may not be the best, however England have a vastly superior spin option to Australia at the present... the fact that we have Swann as no 2, and Rashid waiting in the wings, means that we probably have a much greater strength in depth as well..
Reply With Quote