View Single Post
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 09-03-2008, 10:44 AM in reply to Andy Mellon's post starting "The call on Siddle and Cameron is..."
Rachael Rachael is offline
Administrator
WAT selector
Selector-World XI (1980 onwards)
(ENG-captain) Passed Mike Atherton's 7728 Test runs
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Norfolk
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
Posts: 7,729
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy Mellon View Post
The call on Siddle and Cameron is entirely up to the Chairman of Selectors. Personally, I'd say neither are eligible, but if they have greater claims than the alternatives, then they may be worth considering. As regards Siddle, I think there are other players available who can make the squad.
I'm with you on the eligibility criteria... especially given this:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aurelius View Post
Actually, the pace bowling is in reasonably good shape. Magoffin's been a very consistent and economical bowler for a number of seasons, and would be a good replacement for Stuart Clark if needed. Bollinger's had a phenomonal season too, and Hilfenhaus has actually ended pretty strongly. Another pace option might be Ben Edmonson, who can be a little expensive but has been a big wicket-taker for years now, and a very good one-day bowler.
I'd like to see some evidence (match reports, stats) to back up the claim that Hilfenhaus started the season poorly but ended looking a lot better... but that's no suggesting preferential treatment - each player's season needs to be looked at quite closely for evidence of unrepresentative end-of-season figures.
Reply With Quote