View Single Post
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 18-04-2008, 09:09 AM in reply to flanflinger's post starting "The problem is that Flintoff's form..."
Aurelius Aurelius is offline
(AUS) Passed Craig McDermott's 940 Test runs
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Waterford, Perth, Australia
My main national team: West Indies
My other team/s: Australia, Bangladesh
Posts: 943
Quote:
Originally Posted by flanflinger View Post
The problem is that Flintoff's form with the bat has been so patchy, I wonder if contribute is the right word, and as far as the injury goes, I would like to see how he copes in County Cricket first.

Please read what I am saying -

4. But I feel he needs to spend a few months in County Cricket - probably for the NZ series - to prove that he deserves his place in the team.
That's all fair enough, especially point 4, but all I'm saying is that scoring 100s regularly shouldn't necessarily be a condition of his return.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Milo View Post
When Australia had a good enough bowling line up to play four bowlers, Martyn batted at 6. Before this, Ponting batted at 6 (or Bevan, Blewett) It was only when they lost to England (partly due to their bowlers conceding 400 in first innings) that they decided they needed an all-rounder.
Right- but you're not seriosuly comparing Australia's bowling strength back then to England's now, are you? England need an allrounder who can take wickets far more than an extra batsman IMO.
Reply With Quote