View Single Post
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 26-04-2008, 02:41 PM in reply to Collyisamackem's post starting "In England it would, but then Mahmood..."
Aurelius Aurelius is offline
(AUS) Passed Garth McKenzie's 945 Test runs
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Waterford, Perth, Australia
My main national team: West Indies
My other team/s: Australia, Bangladesh
Posts: 961
Quote:
Originally Posted by Collyisamackem View Post
I don't see anything wrong with an attack of:

Hoggard
Sidebottom
Flintoff
Broad/Onions/Harmison/Plunkett/Mahmood (he's last for a reason)
Panesar

Whatever side we play, Hoggard has to be in it - he's done nothing to deserve being dropped save for being the workhorse and class act of the team for years.
Yes, I like that line-up. I'd go with either Harmison or Broad as the fourth seamer, both of whom have shown steady form so far- probably Broad, as he's a support-type seamer as opposed to Harmison, who's a genuine opener. On the other hand, either Hoggard or Sidebottom would be effective as an old-ball bowler, so Harmison could open with one of them and the other come in second change. I think England's main worry is Flintoff's lack of runs so far.
Reply With Quote