Quote:
Originally Posted by Rachael  In truth, when McGrath, Gillespie and Warne were at their peak, that could have worked, as McGrath and Gillespie were good for 30+ overs a day and Warne would have been Ok to pretty much bowl unchanged for most of every session... |
You're not taking any notice at all of anything anyone else is saying are you? Two people on here have already told you, that the reason Australia were successful with a 4 bowler lineup was soley because of the quality of the bowlers. Yet you still twitter on about the number of overs they could get through.
The reason they were successful is because of their ability with the ball - not the number of overs they could get through!
I know when I'm wasting my time, let's agree to differ.
The proof of the pudding is always in the eating so they say and England are not being particularly successful with a 4 bowler format, let's see how long they can go being unsucessful playing that format before something changes.