Thread: Now and then
View Single Post
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 03-06-2008, 09:05 PM in reply to Ernest's post starting "Yes I agree with the above M, but why..."
Rachael Rachael is offline
Administrator
WAT selector
Selector-World XI (1980 onwards)
(ENG-captain) Passed Mike Atherton's 7728 Test runs
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Norfolk
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
Posts: 7,809
I can see Twenty20 offering injury prone players a way to continue their careers long after their Test career has ended. Sure, it is intense... but a bowler only need manage 4 overs. What is a batsman typically going to face? I haven't paid enough attention to even make an informed guess, but the answer is basically "not many".

I can see Gilchrist, Warne and McGrath carrying on for several more years in Twenty20, and injury afflicted players giving up Test cricket to extend a career in a form of the game that puts rather less strain on the body.
Reply With Quote