View Single Post
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 22-11-2005, 11:06 AM in reply to Andy Mellon's post starting "Hmmm. I still feel the punishment is a..."
Occasional Fan Occasional Fan is offline
Moderator
(NZ-captain) Passed Martin Crowe's 5444 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Prague, Czech Republic
My main national team: England
Posts: 5,511
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy Mellon
I would be interested to know if there are set penalties for different levels of infractions of the rules.
The Code of Conduct sets out penalty ranges for each level of offence. For a level three offence, the punishments specified are a ban of two to four test matches or four to eight ODIs. According to the Code, the ICC uses an "exchange rate" of 2 ODIs being equal to 1 test, so Afridi's punishment is the minimum which could have been awarded for his offence. Presumably, in setting this minimum punishment, his contrition was taken into account. However, like you, Andy, I am surprised that the punishment is at the absolute rock bottom of the range for what was a pretty blatant offence.

Sterner penalties apply for a repetition of a level three offence within twelve months: such a repetition would automatically constitute a level four offence, carrying a penalty of a ban for 5 tests to life (or ten ODIs to life). However, it seems to me that an offence at a lower level than level three will be treated on its own merits (or demerits), unless I have missed something (i.e. if the offender commits, say, a level one offence in the next twelve months, he will be subject only to the penalties specified for such a level one offence).

The Code of Conduct is here for anyone interested in reading it (and I believe this is relatively new: it has certainly changed its form at some point since I reviewed it in connection with Michael Vaughan's offence of criticising the umpires).
__________________
Money won't buy you friends. But it gets you a better class of enemy.
Spike Milligan