Well.. only if you forget his two great predecessors... both of whom were better wicketkeepers... and only if you completely forget to look elsewhere in the world: even Jack Russell and Chris Read tower over Gilchrist as a wicket-keeper... and Godfrey Evans towers over them!

Sangakkara shouldn't even be talked of as a wicket-keeper: he's a batsman. Even Cricinfo notes "During the early days his wicketkeeping could be ragged at times" and that's flattering him: he was considerably worse than "iron hands" Boucher at the start and (like the South African) ain't EVER going to be great for the simple reason that he's not a natural.