View Single Post
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 07-02-2006, 10:53 PM in reply to DomainK's post starting "That I think is one of the most..."
Rachael Rachael is offline
Administrator
WAT selector
Selector-World XI (1980 onwards)
(ENG-captain) Passed Mike Atherton's 7728 Test runs
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Norfolk
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
Posts: 7,830
Quote:
Originally Posted by DomainK
The fact that he played warne so well when so many Australian batsmen fell tp spin bowling proves it.
Nope. Warne like pitches with bounce and pace. He has ALWAYS struggled with sub-continental wickets that are low and slow. These days he can bowl faster and flatter to minimise the damage but it's not his natural game: he prefers his slow, high deliveries... but they just die and give the batsman no real challenge when the pitch is dead.

I should perhaps point out that I'm much taken with Laxman: along with Gower and Mark Waugh he strikes me as one of the most eminently watchable players of his generation. I'm not suggesting he is poor. I'm merely echoing a point made very forcefully in an in depth cricinfo article some time back - that he ain't the guy to pick if you want someone to bat for your life.

The cricinfo article accepted that the guy can play pace... and spin... but questioned his ability to cope with the toughest challenge of all: NOT playing pace and spin. It questioned his ability to play in tough situations when the judicious course of action is to leave everything that could possibly be left.

That's a pretty major weakness considering it's the basis of the sport!
Reply With Quote