View Single Post
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 27-02-2006, 07:47 AM in reply to Django's post starting "I would agree with you on Katich...."
Vrock's Avatar
Vrock Vrock is offline
Moderator
WAT Journalist  
Creator of WAT Cricketers of the Year 2005
Read my Articles
WAT selector - West Indies A
WAT England A Selector-2005
(ENG-captain) Passed Ted Dexter's 4502 Test runs
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Yorkshire
My main national team: England
My other team/s: West Indies, Yorkshire
Posts: 4,433
Send a message via Yahoo to Vrock
Well the Aussies had to go in to that game with only the reamaining players of their squad. The batting line up was severly hampered and Australia played five speacialist bowlers. Watson is seen as an all rounder but with the bat it's not like he a top order batsmen and his lack of bowling (a mere 2 overs) shows the lack of confidence they have in him.

With the return of Symonds and now the inclusion of Jacques in the squad, (Ponting still unfit). I would go for this side.

A C Gilchrist
S M Katich
P Jacques
D R Martyn
A Symonds
M E K Hussey
M J Clarke
B Lee
N W Bracken
M L Lewis
G B Hogg
__________________
Watch this for a perfect about.
James May
Reply With Quote