Thread: Mark Richardson
View Single Post
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 28-03-2006, 08:38 PM in reply to Lemming's post starting "Mongoose is right. Richardson was far..."
Rachael Rachael is offline
Administrator
WAT selector
Selector-World XI (1980 onwards)
(ENG-captain) Passed Mike Atherton's 7728 Test runs
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Norfolk
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
Posts: 7,757
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lemming
A great player? No chance. A guy you'd want on your side? Yeah!, why not?
I quite agree if you mean "does he merit comparison with such complete batsmen as Bradman, Hutton, Tendulkar, Lara, Ponting"... but Flanflinger has rather skewed his poll in the phrasing... and what's really being asked is whether he belongs alongside the best openers of his generation.

So... instead of comparing him with Bradman and Lara we need to compare him with the likes of Atherton, Langer, Smith and Trescothick: whilst he may have "overachieved"... I don't see a problem rating him alongside those guys.

Let's face it... Gooch "overachieved" in the sense of managing, through sheer hard work, to contribute hugely more than many more talented players and yet if you looked post Hutton..... he'd be a front runner to bat alongside Boycott in a fantasy England XI!!!
Reply With Quote