View Single Post
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 25-05-2006, 11:59 AM in reply to Collyisamackem's post starting "I suggest: A game for stage 1, a game..."
Vrock's Avatar
Vrock Vrock is offline
Moderator
WAT Journalist  
Creator of WAT Cricketers of the Year 2005
Read my Articles
WAT selector - West Indies A
WAT England A Selector-2005
(ENG-captain) Passed Ted Dexter's 4502 Test runs
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Yorkshire
My main national team: England
My other team/s: West Indies, Yorkshire
Posts: 4,433
Send a message via Yahoo to Vrock
Quote:
Originally Posted by Collyisamackem
Stage 2 certainly needs to be separate as it is the most congested part.
I agree, there are going to be two groups, this can immediately be split down into two seperate games I feel.

With all of the games so close together I would like to rotate the members who score the games:

Stage 1: 2 members can rotate the scoring (6 games between them)

Stage 2: 4 members can rotate the scoring (2 groups, 6 games in each)

Stage 3/4: 1 member can do the scoring, a member who has not previously scored either stage 1 or 2.

Does any member disagree with this or have any other ideas?
__________________
Watch this for a perfect about.
James May
Reply With Quote