Hide/show banner
Fantasy Cricket

Welcome to the World-A-Team Cricket Forum. We promote friendly, good-natured, quality cricket discussion.
Go Back   World A-Team Cricket Forum > Australia Cricket Forum > AUS Archived Threads 2004
Sitemap Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Contact Us Chat Room Shoutbox News Podcasts Fantasy Cricket

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 08-11-2004, 11:57 PM
Beny's Avatar
Beny Beny is offline
WAT Australia A Selector 2004
WAT Journalist  Read my Articles
(WI-captain) Passed Jimmy Adams' 3012 Test runs
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
My main national team: Australia
My other team/s: Victoria
Posts: 3,027
Send a message via MSN to Beny
Unhappy Ashes 2005 not Free to air

It does not really worry me as I've got Foxtell however it seems that neither Ch 9 or 7 (the two major broadcasters) are willing to take on the Ashes next year.

That mean's that any Aussies that want to watch the big event will either have to get foxtell or go over to England ( ).

Personaly this strikes me as being a total load of garbage.
__________________
It's hard enough to remember my opinions, without remembering my reasons for them!
Nietzsche
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 09-11-2004, 05:32 AM in reply to Beny's post "Ashes 2005 not Free to air"
Maranello's Avatar
Maranello Maranello is offline
Moderator
WAT Pakistan A Selector
WAT selector - England A 2005
(PAK-captain) Passed Mushtaq Mohammad's 3643 Test runs
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Dubai
My main national team: Pakistan
Posts: 3,700
hmm not an expert on Aussie broadcast media, so what exactly is wrong with "getting Foxtell" ?
__________________
A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes
Mark Twain
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 09-11-2004, 04:43 PM in reply to Maranello's post starting ":confused: hmm not an expert on Aussie..."
Mike's Avatar
Mike Mike is offline
Administrator
WAT selector - England A 2005
WAT Journalist  Read my Articles
(ENG-captain) Passed W.G. Grace's 1098 Test runs
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sydney, Australia
My main national team: Australia
My other team/s: England
Posts: 1,119
Send a message via Yahoo to Mike
I think Foxtell is a satellite broadcaster so a dish and a set top box (STB) would need to be purchased. Then there is the installation cost. Cost might be out of reach for many. The cost of broadcast rights is prohibitive nowadays so I'm not surprised with the exchange rate difference between the two countries that the commercial stations didn't buy it. Shame, as I think it will have a negative impact on the public interest for the rivalry in the long term. Did the commercial stations broadcast any of the India v Australian series?
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 09-11-2004, 09:34 PM in reply to Mike's post starting "I think Foxtell is a satellite..."
Beny's Avatar
Beny Beny is offline
WAT Australia A Selector 2004
WAT Journalist  Read my Articles
(WI-captain) Passed Jimmy Adams' 3012 Test runs
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
My main national team: Australia
My other team/s: Victoria
Posts: 3,027
Send a message via MSN to Beny
Foxtell is either Cable or satalite.


The general go is that all oversees matches (other than the world cup or ashes) have been shown on foxtell and Channel nine brodcasts all of the Home matches.
__________________
It's hard enough to remember my opinions, without remembering my reasons for them!
Nietzsche
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 10-11-2004, 01:03 PM in reply to Beny's post starting "Foxtell is either Cable or satalite. ..."
Maranello's Avatar
Maranello Maranello is offline
Moderator
WAT Pakistan A Selector
WAT selector - England A 2005
(PAK-captain) Passed Mushtaq Mohammad's 3643 Test runs
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Dubai
My main national team: Pakistan
Posts: 3,700
That is how it is in England, though here, even some of the home ODIs and the World Cup are on Satellite/Cable.

Hence Beny you guys are no worse off than the rest of the world. Having Sky here has really improved the quality of coverage, and I would much rather have specialised sports broadcasters showing a lot of cricket, than the Beeb showing it in dribs and drabs, with all of three cameras and a scorebook!

Cricket is not a majority sport here, so would be unfair on everyone else if one of the free to air terrestrial channels cleared all its schedules to broadcast nothing but Test matches day after day!

In Pakistan and India, where cricket is a majority sport, that used to happen frequently and no one complained. However, even there, with the hundreds of cable channels available, cricket is now broadcast on specialist sports channels on cable, which are subscribed to by everyone.

Last edited by Maranello : 10-11-2004 at 01:05 PM.
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 11-11-2004, 01:14 AM in reply to Maranello's post starting "That is how it is in England, though..."
Big Merv's Avatar
Big Merv Big Merv is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Broken Hill, Australia
My other team/s: Australia, NSW
Posts: 237
Send a message via MSN to Big Merv Send a message via Yahoo to Big Merv
Well it looks like I wont be watching any cricket this season. Does this put Richie Benaud out of a job? jk
I hope this is not true. Maybe ABC can televise it like they used to. One can only hope, although its highly doubtful.
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 03:10 PM.

Page generated in 0.468 seconds (53.11% PHP - 46.89% MySQL) with 13 queries

Partner Sites: - pakistancricketzone.com | Fantasy Cricket | Cricket World Cup Images | Cricket 24/7 | Third Umpire | Indian Cricket League

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0