Hide/show banner
Fantasy Cricket

Welcome to the World-A-Team Cricket Forum. We promote friendly, good-natured, quality cricket discussion.
Go Back   World A-Team Cricket Forum > Australia Cricket Forum > AUS Archived Threads 2005 Onwards.
Sitemap Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Contact Us Chat Room Shoutbox News Podcasts Fantasy Cricket

AUS Archived Threads 2005 Onwards. Austraia home forum.

View Poll Results: Which is the stronger attack:
The Australian attack is significantly stronger than the English attack. 14 35.90%
The Australian attack is marginally stronger than the English attack. 11 28.21%
There really isn't much in it. 7 17.95%
The English attack is marginally stronger than the Australian attack. 5 12.82%
The English attack is significantly stronger than the Australian attack. 2 5.13%
Voters: 39. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 29-12-2004, 08:58 AM in reply to Occasional Fan's post starting "I'm getting a bit confused by this..."
vvvrulz's Avatar
vvvrulz vvvrulz is offline
Back from the dead.
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: New Zealand
My main national team: I support more than one national team
My other team/s: India, West Indies, Sri Lanka
Posts: 1,252
Send a message via MSN to vvvrulz Send a message via Yahoo to vvvrulz
My two cents:

Australian attack is much stronger for two reasons. The third seamer (Kasper/Lee) and Shane Warne. Both these elements complete an attack which compliments each other perfectly and is able to break through basically any batting order. The English attack, while its far better than it has been for a long time, really lack a good quality spinner in my opinion (Giles to me is only half-decent). Hoggard is somewhat inconsistant too i might add.
__________________
- VVVRulz..
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 02-01-2005, 09:55 AM in reply to Occasional Fan's post starting "I'm getting a bit confused by this..."
redback's Avatar
redback redback is offline
Maiden century
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
My main national team: Australia
My other team/s: Victoria
Posts: 108
Talking

The constant jibes about Mcgrath being over the hill are coming from english supporters that have not seen him for a few years..... one thing he does now adays is swing the ball more than he has ever come Ashes time he will still take 20 + wickets at around 25 Warne all tho he will not bowl a Gatting ball ( HOW GOOD WAS THAT ) will also get 20 +



Keep writing us off at yor own peril geee i am going to love this site in July
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 02-01-2005, 12:31 PM in reply to redback's post starting "The constant jibes about Mcgrath being..."
Seamer Seamer is offline
(ENG) Passed Wilfred Rhodes' 2325 Test runs
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
Posts: 2,361
"Grampa" McGrath will take closer to 40

I agree that McGrath will make life very difficult for the English bats. English conditions suit him more than anywhere else in the world and the same could be said for the rest of our bowlers.He is as accurate as ever but is now doing more with the ball. The Aussie team is pumped up for this one and will lift their game vastly as compared to to their current mediocre form (even though they are still winning).
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 06-01-2005, 10:04 AM in reply to Seamer's post ""Grampa" McGrath will take..."
Beny's Avatar
Beny Beny is offline
WAT Australia A Selector 2004
WAT Journalist  Read my Articles
(WI-captain) Passed Jimmy Adams' 3012 Test runs
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
My main national team: Australia
My other team/s: Victoria
Posts: 3,041
Send a message via MSN to Beny
Note that McGrath has developed his swing and is moving it both ways. He also has a new slower ball.
__________________
It's hard enough to remember my opinions, without remembering my reasons for them!
Nietzsche
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 06-01-2005, 11:19 AM in reply to Beny's post starting "Note that McGrath has developed his..."
Seamer Seamer is offline
(ENG) Passed Wilfred Rhodes' 2325 Test runs
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
Posts: 2,361
What about Kasprowitc(Hows it spelt?)

I reckon Kaspa a bit of a dark horse too. I mean, no one does more off the wicket than him. If he can get movement off the pitch on an Indian dustbowl, imagine what he will do on a seaming English wicket
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 07-01-2005, 02:02 AM in reply to Seamer's post "What about Kasprowitc(Hows it spelt?)"
Beny's Avatar
Beny Beny is offline
WAT Australia A Selector 2004
WAT Journalist  Read my Articles
(WI-captain) Passed Jimmy Adams' 3012 Test runs
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
My main national team: Australia
My other team/s: Victoria
Posts: 3,041
Send a message via MSN to Beny
Know you know why they just call him Kaspa!

He rekons that his spell over in England did him a lot of goog. On top of that he's developed and Inswinger.
__________________
It's hard enough to remember my opinions, without remembering my reasons for them!
Nietzsche
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 07-01-2005, 11:47 AM in reply to Beny's post starting "Know you know why they just call him..."
Seamer Seamer is offline
(ENG) Passed Wilfred Rhodes' 2325 Test runs
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
Posts: 2,361
Poor England

I don,t know if you have cable or not but if you did, did you see look on the English bowlers faces as as they were getting carted around the park by Kallis? I think we will see a fair bit more of that come July because they will be up against 7 Kallis,s in fast forward!
__________________

  #28 (permalink)  
Old 27-09-2005, 02:40 PM in reply to Seamer's post "Poor England"
lindas legs lindas legs is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Mansfield
My other team/s: Notts & England
Posts: 18
I just enjoyed reading some of the posts above.Its amazing what can happen in such a short time.Gillespie and Kas are gone and McGrath is injury prone.The England bowlers have spent the summer bowling out seven Kallis's.Who would have thought it.
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 09-10-2005, 10:26 PM in reply to lindas legs's post starting "I just enjoyed reading some of the..."
Mike's Avatar
Mike Mike is offline
Administrator
WAT selector - England A 2005
WAT Journalist  Read my Articles
(ENG-captain) Passed W.G. Grace's 1098 Test runs
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sydney, Australia
My main national team: Australia
My other team/s: England
Posts: 1,150
Send a message via Yahoo to Mike
Yes, it's fun reading these old threads and imagining the egg dripping of their faces. Bet Rachael would like to retract this doozey:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rachael
Agreed. Kasprowicz is the supposed "weak link".. and it's true that he's not in the class of Gillespie, McGrath and Warne... but he's better than any other Test team's 1st change seamer: he'd certainly get into the English side ahead of Jones / Anderson.

Point is.. the Aussies have three bowlers who are at least as capable as Harmison... and worthy of discussion for a place in a world XI.. and we have Harmison alone.
No mention of Flintoff who engineered the Ashes victory as 1st change bowler. Not as good as Kaspa, eh?

And you gotta admire Ernest's unflinching certainty of a change of guard after the Ashes.
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 11-10-2005, 05:17 AM in reply to Mike's post starting "Yes, it's fun reading these old threads..."
Beny's Avatar
Beny Beny is offline
WAT Australia A Selector 2004
WAT Journalist  Read my Articles
(WI-captain) Passed Jimmy Adams' 3012 Test runs
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
My main national team: Australia
My other team/s: Victoria
Posts: 3,041
Send a message via MSN to Beny
Had we gone to England with the bowling attack which we went to India with then none of these comments would be wrong at all. As it is, Flintoff is going at 8 an over down in Aus at the momment and Harmison only really bowled OK rather than fantasticly. Australia managed to rout the English batting more than once when we were using bowlers who either we'rnt proforming or were only 80% fit.

To claim that the English Bowling attack is a) better now than the Aussie side's or b) was better than the Aussie attack before, is the same as saying Harbijan Singh is a bloody fantastic bowler because he does well in the Sub-Continent.
Let me ask you, if England had lost Flintoff through injury, Harmison through horrible form (it happens to him a fair bit) and Jones was only bowling half as well as normal, do you think they could have done as well as Australia did in very simmiler circumstances?
__________________
It's hard enough to remember my opinions, without remembering my reasons for them!
Nietzsche
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 06:18 PM.

Page generated in 0.541 seconds (68.27% PHP - 31.73% MySQL) with 14 queries

Partner Sites: - pakistancricketzone.com | Fantasy Cricket | Cricket World Cup Images | Cricket 24/7 | Third Umpire | Indian Cricket League

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0