Hide/show banner
Fantasy Cricket

Welcome to the World-A-Team Cricket Forum. We promote friendly, good-natured, quality cricket discussion.
Go Back   World A-Team Cricket Forum > Australia Cricket Forum > AUS Archived Threads 2005 Onwards.
Sitemap Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Contact Us Chat Room Shoutbox News Podcasts Fantasy Cricket

AUS Archived Threads 2005 Onwards. Austraia home forum.

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 13-06-2005, 07:19 AM in reply to Beny's post starting "Yeah, but they get paid to take it..."
AussieCricketLover's Avatar
AussieCricketLover AussieCricketLover is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Adelaide
My other team/s: Australia
Posts: 77
What about bracken, watson and tait??? thats just the start mate.
__________________
Never argue with an idiot, they bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.

Last edited by Beny : 13-06-2005 at 08:46 AM.
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 13-06-2005, 08:16 AM in reply to AussieCricketLover's post starting "What about bracken, watson and tait???..."
Andy Mellon's Avatar
Andy Mellon Andy Mellon is offline
Moderator
WAT selector - England A 2005
WAT New Zealand A Selector
WAT Journalist  Read my Articles
(NZ-captain) Passed Ken Rutherford's 2465 Test runs
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Wellington, NZ
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Essex and New Zealand
Posts: 2,477
Send a message via Yahoo to Andy Mellon
They are hardly in the same class as McGrath or Gillespie, are they ACL? Shaun Tait could get there as he's still young, but he looks more to be in the Brett Lee mould than the more consistent McGrath or Gillespie.
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 13-06-2005, 08:31 AM in reply to AussieCricketLover's post starting "What about bracken, watson and tait???..."
Paoli's Avatar
Paoli Paoli is offline
(WI) Passed Jeffery Dujon's 3322 Test runs
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
My main national team: Australia
My other team/s: Newcastle United
Posts: 3,330
No ACL, Beny isn't smoking anything, just being realistic. Bracken is probably the best bowler we have at domestic ranks, but not in the class of any of the top four. Tait; raw, could be brilliant, but Brett Lee was doing alot more than Tait at his age.

As for Shane Watson, don't get me started. Throughout his career, I doubt he has ever got any movement off the seam. He is relatively quick, but until he learns to penetrate like McGrath and Gillespie, we can't call him a "up and comer".
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 13-06-2005, 08:45 AM in reply to Paoli's post starting "No ACL, Beny isn't smoking anything,..."
Leafy Seadragon Leafy Seadragon is offline
(ENG) Passed Angus Fraser's 388 Test runs
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Adelaide
My other team/s: Australia
Posts: 387
Paoli, exactly what was Lee doing more than Tait? Lee made his test debut at 23 and ODI at 24. Tait's now only 22. Last season he took more first class wickets than Lee dreamed about at that point in his career. Tait's already touring with the big boys and has been for a while. How was Lee doing a lot more?
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 13-06-2005, 08:52 AM in reply to Paoli's post starting "No ACL, Beny isn't smoking anything,..."
Rachael Rachael is offline
Administrator
WAT selector
Selector-World XI (1980 onwards)
(ENG-captain) Passed Mike Atherton's 7728 Test runs
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Norfolk
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
Posts: 7,835
Surely the example of Kasprowicz breaking into the big time at approaching 30... and the fact that Brett Lee finally seems to have started maturing into a decent bowler... suggests that writing off the likes of Bracken (let alone Tait) is foolhardy. Simon Jones is just starting to master lateral movement at something like 26-27: he's still totally undercooked as an International bowler but from no-where has started showing promise. Hoggard was dropped and looked finished after the Sri Lanka tour 18 months ago and then suddenly started leading the attack.

Let's face it... if the coaches can get a passable if limited Test bowler out of someone as unpromising as Flintoff (and he really was hopeless for his first 4-5 years) then they can make passable test bowlers out of guys like Tait and Watson.
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 13-06-2005, 08:54 AM in reply to Rachael's post starting "Surely the example of Kasprowicz..."
Beny's Avatar
Beny Beny is offline
WAT Australia A Selector 2004
WAT Journalist  Read my Articles
(WI-captain) Passed Jimmy Adams' 3012 Test runs
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
My main national team: Australia
My other team/s: Victoria
Posts: 3,041
Send a message via MSN to Beny
Fact is, we can't replace McGrath, Gillespie or Warne.
__________________
It's hard enough to remember my opinions, without remembering my reasons for them!
Nietzsche
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 13-06-2005, 09:13 AM in reply to Beny's post "The Ashes... All hype??"
flanflinger's Avatar
flanflinger flanflinger is offline
WAT England A Selector-2005
WAT Journalist  Read my Articles
(AUS-captain) Passed Kim Hughes' 4415 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Bristol
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Surrey and the Mighty Mighty Quinns
Posts: 4,450
Braken and Watson are hardly in the same class as McGrath, Gilly and Kaspo... Tait has the pace, but pace needs to be combined with accuracy, something that Lee has struggled with...

Then there is the other piece of the jigsaw - Warne, he is unique, you will not see another Warne for a long time.

India have some great Batsmen, but if you can't bowl a side out twice you won't win test matches consitsently. Can you really see a bowling attack of Watson, Braken, Tait and Hauritz ever being as frighteneing as the current attack?

The Australians will have some great batting depth to come. My fear is that some of the players may struggle to step up unless they start getting exposed soon. I feel for Lehmann when he was at his peak, he was out of the side - finally gets introuduced has his time in the sun, but it's all now over all too quickly.. There are quiet a few Aussies in the same boat...

Like many English guys, I feel if we win these Ashes it will be a bonus. But the ECB has set a traget World Number 1 by 2007, I feel the 2007 Ashes are a distinct possibility....
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 13-06-2005, 11:08 PM in reply to flanflinger's post starting "Braken and Watson are hardly in the..."
Leafy Seadragon Leafy Seadragon is offline
(ENG) Passed Angus Fraser's 388 Test runs
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Adelaide
My other team/s: Australia
Posts: 387
I think the home advantage to Australia is substantial (as it is to virtually every team playing test cricket). Someone pointed out in another thread that away victories (other than against minnows) are few and far between, made only look straightforward by this Aussie team - this made England's efforts in the Carribean and SA all the more impressive. However, I think in all likelihood the Aussies would be favourites to defend the Ashes in Australia, even with a team weakened from now. I supect that, failing an upset this time round, the English best bet is 2009 on home turf again.
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 14-06-2005, 09:10 AM in reply to Leafy Seadragon's post starting "I think the home advantage to Australia..."
Victor Frankenstein's Avatar
Victor Frankenstein Victor Frankenstein is offline
(ENG) Passed Bob Taylor's 1156 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Hampshire
My main national team: England
Posts: 1,187
i'm not sure, i think ironically englands current bowling attack is probably better suited to australian wickets than it is to english ones (harmison, jones and flintoff all bowling better on hard surfaces with a lot of bounce, which aren't common in england till late summer).

I think it has been over hyped and i think it's a shame as i do think this is the best england team we've had in a long long time, but we've been so far behind australia in the past ashes series that even with our strongest team ever it doesn't mean we'll actually compete, 200 all out just becomes 270 all out, a loss by an innings and 50 runs becomes a loss by 10 wickets etc..

Not being pessimistic, i do hope and believe that england can compete properly and take australia to the 5th day in all the tests, but the difference between the sides is we have to play at our very best for 25 days, the australians can play at 60% and still be better than us on previous form, that's a hell of a lot, it's effectively saying two of their bats can average less than 20 and one of their bowlers can get less than 10 wickets in the series and they'd STILL be beating us comfortably.

It's cricket though, anything can happen, I do think the australian team has underestimated how much we've improved, the 20-20 victory shows nothing of our talent as it's just for fun, but it may have made the australians realise just how much winning this entire summer means to us and all the players will play with an intensity that was completely lacking in previous ashes contests.

I hope it does all live up to the hype and we have a real cracker or a series, even if england lose, because i think test cricket needs a close hard fought series as there have been too many walk overs and collapses of late.
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 30-06-2005, 06:37 PM in reply to Beny's post "The Ashes... All hype??"
monotonetuba monotonetuba is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: london
My other team/s: england
Posts: 18
Smile

i'm sorry i do not see how this series is over hyped.australia the no 1 against the old adversary which of course are england at no 2,and this is an ashes series with a resurgent england side who by mr benauds words "have every chance of winning"....(but what does he know).I dont think it would suprise any pom deep down if the ozzies reclaimed the ashes but as a realistic pom i think it could be closer than you all think and judging by the early encounters in the one dayers this england are pumped up and confident and will not lie down as previous england teams have done.
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 05:51 PM.

Page generated in 0.584 seconds (54.90% PHP - 45.10% MySQL) with 13 queries

Partner Sites: - pakistancricketzone.com | Fantasy Cricket | Cricket World Cup Images | Cricket 24/7 | Third Umpire | Indian Cricket League

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0