Hide/show banner
Fantasy Cricket

Welcome to the World-A-Team Cricket Forum. We promote friendly, good-natured, quality cricket discussion.
Go Back   World A-Team Cricket Forum > Australia Cricket Forum > AUS Archived Threads 2005 Onwards.
Sitemap Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Contact Us Chat Room Shoutbox News Podcasts Fantasy Cricket

AUS Archived Threads 2005 Onwards. Austraia home forum.

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 10-08-2005, 08:38 AM in reply to Seamer's post starting "Come now Tresco, despite all the above..."
Trescothick's Avatar
Trescothick Trescothick is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Uxbridge, London
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Bermuda
Posts: 654
Send a message via MSN to Trescothick
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seamer
Come now Tresco, despite all the above factors, the English still only just won. Deep down, you know the truth, though i hardly expect you to admit it. Either way, the English won and that is a good thing as the series would otherwise be dead. Despite injuries ect, the Aussies will hit back and win 3 or 4-1 - to much class, but for the sake of the series, it was important England won that one. I am genuinely happy for the long suffering English fans.
Why would you have neccesary won? Our bowlers were actually making the ball move around a little bit and the Aussies would have slogged away and found themselves in trouble like they did in the 2nd innings and getting all out for 300 odd. The pitch did not change between the 1st and 2nd innings enough to dramatically change anything.
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 10-08-2005, 11:59 AM in reply to Trescothick's post starting "Why would you have neccesary won? Our..."
Seamer Seamer is offline
(ENG) Passed Wilfred Rhodes' 2325 Test runs
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
Posts: 2,361
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trescothick
Why would you have neccesary won? Our bowlers were actually making the ball move around a little bit and the Aussies would have slogged away and found themselves in trouble like they did in the 2nd innings and getting all out for 300 odd. The pitch did not change between the 1st and 2nd innings enough to dramatically change anything.
Tresco, McGrath's injury moments before the game started was crucial and you know it. Everyone acnowledges (deep down you too i suspect) that Ponting made a huge mistake in bowling first. All i am saying is all things equal, the Aussies would have won it in a canter. But cricket is a funny game, England won it fair and square and full credit to them.
The Aussie's had the worst of the pitch conditions no doubt, but that was Pontings fault and he paid the price. It is a culmination of these factors that ended up in a narrow defeat - not complaining or making excuses, just my honest assesment thats all.
__________________

  #23 (permalink)  
Old 10-08-2005, 12:03 PM in reply to anthman's post starting "Ok I can more or less agree on that. ..."
Seamer Seamer is offline
(ENG) Passed Wilfred Rhodes' 2325 Test runs
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
Posts: 2,361
Quote:
Originally Posted by anthman
Ok I can more or less agree on that. Would your position change if we were to lose at Old Trafford?
anthman, i won't answer that one yet because i honestly think we will win and win well at Old Trafford. If we do lose however, my thoughts might well change and we will have to reopen this thread again in that case. Hopefully we won't have to
__________________

  #24 (permalink)  
Old 12-08-2005, 06:24 AM in reply to Seamer's post starting "anthman, i won't answer that one yet..."
anthman anthman is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sydney
My other team/s: Australia
Posts: 71
Well from the looks of things, if Hayden wants to prove me wrong, he's about to get his opporunity. Having read your Gillispie thread, I'm hoping only one of has to say "I told you so" at the end of this Test.
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 12-08-2005, 06:59 AM in reply to Seamer's post starting "Tresco, McGrath's injury moments before..."
The Phantom Ram's Avatar
The Phantom Ram The Phantom Ram is offline
WAT selector - England A 2005
Selector-World XI (1980 onwards)
WAT Journalist  Read my Articles
(AUS) Passed Garth McKenzie's 945 Test runs
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: West Bridgford, Nottingham
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Derbyshire
Posts: 962
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seamer
Tresco, McGrath's injury moments before the game started was crucial and you know it. Everyone acnowledges (deep down you too i suspect) that Ponting made a huge mistake in bowling first. All i am saying is all things equal, the Aussies would have won it in a canter. But cricket is a funny game, England won it fair and square and full credit to them.
Seamer, I agree with most things you say, but can't agree with this. There is no way of telling whether McGrath would have been a success at Edgbaston - history suggests he wouldn't - and remember if he was in the side your tail end batting (which produced a good percentage of your runs) would have been a lot lot weaker. I don't think a game can be reviewed along the lines of if we had player A we would have won, it is impossible to do and who knows without all our injuries in Australia for the last Ashes we might now be talking about us retaining rather than winning them back. I also don't think the toss was as important in the last game as a lot of people made out.
__________________
Steven
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 12-08-2005, 12:43 PM in reply to The Phantom Ram's post starting "Seamer, I agree with most things you..."
Seamer Seamer is offline
(ENG) Passed Wilfred Rhodes' 2325 Test runs
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
Posts: 2,361
Just stating my opinion PR, which is sometimes right, sometimes wrong. The phycological blow was a factor - imagine if the same happened to Harmison, for example.
Anyway, as the saying goes "If if's and but's were candy and nuts". We will never know for certain - maybe England still would have won but just in a different way. I agree with your sentiments all in all.
__________________

  #27 (permalink)  
Old 12-08-2005, 09:13 PM in reply to Seamer's post starting "Just stating my opinion PR, which is..."
The Phantom Ram's Avatar
The Phantom Ram The Phantom Ram is offline
WAT selector - England A 2005
Selector-World XI (1980 onwards)
WAT Journalist  Read my Articles
(AUS) Passed Garth McKenzie's 945 Test runs
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: West Bridgford, Nottingham
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Derbyshire
Posts: 962
I appreciate that Seamer, opinions are opinions mate, if we all always agreed life would be a bit boring wouldn't it? Yes I agree an injury to Harmison would be a mortal blow, especially as we would need to bring in a test novice in to the side - Tremlett. Difficult to compare the two instances I suppose.
__________________
Steven
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 13-08-2005, 12:12 AM in reply to The Phantom Ram's post starting "I appreciate that Seamer, opinions are..."
Beny's Avatar
Beny Beny is offline
WAT Australia A Selector 2004
WAT Journalist  Read my Articles
(WI-captain) Passed Jimmy Adams' 3012 Test runs
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
My main national team: Australia
My other team/s: Victoria
Posts: 3,041
Send a message via MSN to Beny
Ok I'm fed up... Drop Hayden and bring in Hussy.
__________________
It's hard enough to remember my opinions, without remembering my reasons for them!
Nietzsche
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 13-08-2005, 07:45 AM in reply to Beny's post starting "Ok I'm fed up... Drop Hayden and bring..."
The Phantom Ram's Avatar
The Phantom Ram The Phantom Ram is offline
WAT selector - England A 2005
Selector-World XI (1980 onwards)
WAT Journalist  Read my Articles
(AUS) Passed Garth McKenzie's 945 Test runs
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: West Bridgford, Nottingham
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Derbyshire
Posts: 962
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beny
Ok I'm fed up... Drop Hayden and bring in Hussy.
Which one? Not the one at Durham please he's in my fantasy cricket team. Please have the Notts one!
__________________
Steven
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 13-08-2005, 09:14 AM in reply to The Phantom Ram's post starting "Which one? Not the one at Durham..."
cantplaycantalk cantplaycantalk is offline
(PAK) Passed Abdul Qadir's 1029 Test runs
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
My main national team: I support more than one national team
My other team/s: Durham, England, West Indies
Posts: 1,032
Sorry to tell you but the Durham one is off to play for Aus A in Pakistan after the Yorkshire match.
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 06:02 PM.

Page generated in 0.544 seconds (63.43% PHP - 36.57% MySQL) with 13 queries

Partner Sites: - pakistancricketzone.com | Fantasy Cricket | Cricket World Cup Images | Cricket 24/7 | Third Umpire | Indian Cricket League

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0