Hide/show banner
World A-Team Cricket Forum

Welcome to the World-A-Team Cricket Forum. We promote friendly, good-natured, quality cricket discussion.
Go Back   World A-Team Cricket Forum > Australia Cricket Forum > AUS Archived Threads 2005 Onwards.
Sitemap Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Contact Us Chat Room Shoutbox News Podcasts Fantasy Cricket

AUS Archived Threads 2005 Onwards. Austraia home forum.

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 08-08-2005, 11:09 AM
Andy Mellon's Avatar
Andy Mellon Andy Mellon is offline
Moderator
WAT selector - England A 2005
WAT New Zealand A Selector
WAT Journalist  Read my Articles
(NZ-captain) Passed Ken Rutherford's 2465 Test runs
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Wellington, NZ
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Essex and New Zealand
Posts: 2,467
Send a message via Yahoo to Andy Mellon
Matthew Hayden vs Mike Hussey

Just wondering if any Aussie fans would prefer to see Mike Hussey in the Aussie line up rather than Matty Hayden.

Hayden's looking seriously out of form, and although he may be due a score, why not give Hussey a try. In the ODIs, he looked by far the best bat on show, and at times, England really struggled to find a hole in his defence. He averages 129 in ODIs, and 52.27 in first class cricket.

Anyone else think he deserves a shot at the big time?
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 08-08-2005, 01:10 PM in reply to Andy Mellon's post "Matthew Hayden vs Mike Hussey"
Rachael Rachael is offline
Administrator
WAT selector
Selector-World XI (1980 onwards)
(AUS) Passed Justin Langer's 7696 Test runs
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Norfolk
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
Posts: 7,726
As a neutral I certainly would: Hayden looks like a bit of a fraud, really - a flat track bully whose height and stance (considerably infront of the crease) have allowed him (at least against the fairly modest attacks he's generally faced) to disguise the fact that he's really just a foot front brute with too much power for his own good.
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 08-08-2005, 01:21 PM in reply to Rachael's post starting "As a neutral I certainly would: Hayden..."
cantplaycantalk cantplaycantalk is offline
(PAK) Passed Abdul Qadir's 1029 Test runs
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
My main national team: I support more than one national team
My other team/s: Durham, England, West Indies
Posts: 1,032
Nice to see England are giving the Aussies some selection problems isn't it.
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 08-08-2005, 01:44 PM in reply to cantplaycantalk's post starting "Nice to see England are giving the..."
Seamer's Avatar
Seamer Seamer is offline
(ENG) Passed Wilfred Rhodes' 2325 Test runs
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
Posts: 2,312
Australia will not change the batting order during this series. After though, changes will start as we have a relitively easy run for the next 18 months which will give us time to rebuild, while keeping a strong hold on theno1 position.

As for Hayden, well he has been getting starts while not going on with it. The same can be said for all the Aussie bats i suppose. It would be more concerning if he was consistantly failing altogether but the fact he is getting a start means his form is not too much of a worry. Like the rest of the rest of the Aussie bats, the big ones are not far off.
I think England have the problem with failing batsmen, not Australia, which is why English are starting threads like this and not Aussies. We do have problems with Gillespie/Kasprowicz, but the batting will take care of itself for the remainder of this tour.
__________________
The thought police are everywhere..............
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 08-08-2005, 02:26 PM in reply to Seamer's post starting "Australia will not change the batting..."
The Phantom Ram's Avatar
The Phantom Ram The Phantom Ram is offline
WAT selector - England A 2005
Selector-World XI (1980 onwards)
WAT Journalist  Read my Articles
(AUS) Passed Craig McDermott's 940 Test runs
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: West Bridgford, Nottingham
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Derbyshire
Posts: 942
Talking

Seamer, it's a pity a few more of your batsmen weren't as defensive as your post!!
__________________
Steven
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 08-08-2005, 05:29 PM in reply to Seamer's post starting "Australia will not change the batting..."
King Aragorn's Avatar
King Aragorn King Aragorn is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Paris, France
My main national team: Pakistan
My other team/s: Sussex
Posts: 148
Hussey should surely be brought in for the fourth test if Hayden fails yet again at Old Trafford.

Hayden did look in good touch in the second innings at Edgbaston and if he plays a big innings at Old Trafford, well and good. But he has been the weak link in Aussie batting of late. Every other batsman has got regular good starts while Hayden's average is not only worse than that of every Australian batsman but it's even lower than that of Shane Warne and Brett Lee!

Hussey has done superbly well in the domestic circuit and he played some wonderful knocks under tremendous pressure in the recent ODIs. He's surely capable of dealing with the situation if thrown into the ring for the fourth test. He might not set the world on fire, but he'll most probably do better than Hayden.
__________________
"Our greatest glory is not in never falling, but in rising everytime we fall."
Confucius
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 09-08-2005, 12:52 AM in reply to King Aragorn's post starting "Hussey should surely be brought in for..."
anthman anthman is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sydney
My other team/s: Australia
Posts: 71
Quote:
Originally Posted by King Aragorn
Hussey should surely be brought in for the fourth test if Hayden fails yet again at Old Trafford.
I agree. Dropping Hayden is one of my favourite hobby horses. They've been saying for 18 months he would play himself into form. Well he hasn't, so get rid of him cause right now he's holding Langer back.

I don't care if they bring in Hussey, or they re-jig the line up so that Clarke or Gilly opens, but right now Hayden is a liability that we can't afford (and I don't care how good his catching is).

Unfortunately Australia is completely reactive when it comes to selection issues so I can't see if happening unless we lose the series.

Last edited by anthman : 09-08-2005 at 02:01 PM.
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 09-08-2005, 02:59 AM in reply to The Phantom Ram's post starting "Seamer, it's a pity a few more of your..."
Seamer's Avatar
Seamer Seamer is offline
(ENG) Passed Wilfred Rhodes' 2325 Test runs
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
Posts: 2,312
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Phantom Ram
Seamer, it's a pity a few more of your batsmen weren't as defensive as your post!!
Well it is a good thing that the Aussie batsmen and selectors are'nt as prone to panic-mongering as the rest of the posters in this thread
__________________
The thought police are everywhere..............
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 09-08-2005, 03:04 AM in reply to Seamer's post starting "Well it is a good thing that the Aussie..."
anthman anthman is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sydney
My other team/s: Australia
Posts: 71
Our entire batting style is built around the Langer-Hayden partnership working and getting us off to that flying 100 run start. But it's not working any more, and hasn't for a while now. Something's gotta give, and I would prefer that it wasn't the Ashes thanks.
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 09-08-2005, 03:35 AM in reply to anthman's post starting "Our entire batting style is built..."
Seamer's Avatar
Seamer Seamer is offline
(ENG) Passed Wilfred Rhodes' 2325 Test runs
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
Posts: 2,312
No need to panic and start with the knee-jerk reactions. Now is the WORST time you could make changes. Look at England and how they reacted after a thrashing at Lord's. They (sensibly) did'nt panic and kept an unchanged team and subsequently won the next test.
Remember Martyn's long form slump? Look at him now. Clarke scoring 127 runs in 7 tests? Hit a crucial 91 at Lords and ended his form slump.
The Aussie batsmen, management and selectors will not panic however, and that is all that matters in the end.
__________________
The thought police are everywhere..............
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 10:36 PM.

Page generated in 0.498 seconds (66.36% PHP - 33.64% MySQL) with 13 queries

Partner Sites: - pakistancricketzone.com | Fantasy Cricket | Cricket World Cup Images | Cricket 24/7 | Third Umpire | Indian Cricket League

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0