Hide/show banner
World A-Team Cricket Forum

Welcome to the World-A-Team Cricket Forum. We promote friendly, good-natured, quality cricket discussion.
Go Back   World A-Team Cricket Forum > Australia Cricket Forum > AUS Archived Threads 2005 Onwards.
Sitemap Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Contact Us Chat Room Shoutbox News Podcasts Fantasy Cricket

AUS Archived Threads 2005 Onwards. Austraia home forum.

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 30-10-2005, 01:29 PM
Oddo21 Oddo21 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Australia
My other team/s: Australia
Posts: 6
Lightbulb Australia

If Australia had to choose a medel for it's best up and coming player in Australia over the next five years, who would it be.
  1. Michael Clarke
  2. Shane Watson
  3. Mike Hussey
  4. David Hussey
  5. Cameron White
  6. OTHER
Vote the number and the reason this player should be, If other who would it be and why.

Last edited by Paoli : 31-10-2005 at 02:24 AM. Reason: Splitting Thread
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 31-10-2005, 02:56 AM in reply to Oddo21's post "Australia"
julain87 julain87 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Crescent Head, NSW, Australia
My other team/s: New Zealand, Tasmania
Posts: 1
Phil Jacques.

This guy will be a very dominant Test and One Day opener for Australia as soon as either Hayden or Langer are dropped or retire. Also as soon as the selectors bite the bullet and thrust him into the one day team (for the next world cup). This guy is talented, consistent and attacking. Every thing a good Aussie batter needs.
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 06-11-2005, 10:50 PM in reply to Oddo21's post "Australia"
Cordy's Avatar
Cordy Cordy is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Derby, UK
My other team/s: Australia, Lancashire, Western Warriors
Posts: 8
Michael Clarke - easy. I think this guy is a future star and possible captain.
__________________
When a 19-year-old boy from Bowral stepped onto the world stage in 1929, cricket changed forever.
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 14-12-2005, 01:27 AM in reply to Cordy's post starting "Michael Clarke - easy. I think this..."
simo_rulzzz simo_rulzzz is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: perth western australia australia
My other team/s: australia western warriors
Posts: 2
Smile

i think david hussey because just watching his agressive style for victoria makes him a very good player. he can go for almost any bowler and hit them for four. also i think phill jaques has a solid future in international cricket
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 14-12-2005, 02:44 AM in reply to simo_rulzzz's post starting "i think david hussey because just..."
smickel's Avatar
smickel smickel is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Brisbane, Australia
My other team/s: Queensland, Australia
Posts: 80
Send a message via MSN to smickel
The competition would be between Michael Clarke, Mark Cosgrove, David Hussey or Cameron White. I think Clarke would win because he has already played for Australia and scored a few centuries but if the medal was to be given out today Mark Cosgrove would win because of the great form that he has been in. I wouldn't choose Michael Hussey to win because he has been around for a long time and has proven that he is a very good player but only recently has been able to break into the Australian side because of the departure of players such as the Waugh twins, Damien Martyn and Darren Lehmann.
__________________
Smickel
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 22-12-2005, 01:48 AM in reply to smickel's post starting "The competition would be between..."
Quagmire's Avatar
Quagmire Quagmire is offline
WAT World Cup Predictor
WAT Journalist
Moderator
(SA) Passed Colin Bland's 1669 Test runs
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: melbourne
My main national team: Australia
My other team/s: Victoria, Lancashire, Durham
Posts: 1,646
I think that David Hussey and Jaques are a little bit too old to call them up and coming players, its like calling Bracken an up and coming player. there all in there late 20's

up and coming players are usually under 25 years old
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 22-12-2005, 08:48 AM in reply to simo_rulzzz's post starting "i think david hussey because just..."
redback's Avatar
redback redback is offline
Maiden century
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
My main national team: Australia
My other team/s: Victoria
Posts: 108
Quote:
Originally Posted by simo_rulzzz
i think david hussey because just watching his agressive style for victoria makes him a very good player. he can go for almost any bowler and hit them for four. also i think phill jaques has a solid future in international cricket
I agree totally but we must keep big Merv as a selector or Hussey has to move to NSW
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 27-12-2005, 11:25 PM in reply to Oddo21's post "Australia"
Leafy Seadragon Leafy Seadragon is offline
(ENG) Passed Angus Fraser's 388 Test runs
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Adelaide
My other team/s: Australia
Posts: 387
I think that you should add that young Bradman chap to your list of up and comers. Something tells me he'll be a bit special.

I think that the only consideration of most of the listed players as 'up and coming' would be as future coaches or slectors. David Hussey is probably closer to retirement than a baggy green test cap. I would suggest that Clarke (as the current Australian Player of the Year) is hardly 'up and coming' - not to suggest that he doesn't have a bright future, just that he's already arrived. Michael Hussey at nearly 31 is older than some test retirees - he's about the same age as Jason Gillespie (another 'up and coming'?).

As for the others in the list and those mentioned, I'd put Watson ahead of White marginally, although both could either be the answer to Gilchrist's loss of form (or not). Cosgrove needs to show this form for a full season or longer. He's only just back from being dropped due to complete loss of form at the end of 2004/5 and fitness issues at the start of this season. Jaques has potential and I'd probably put him ahead of both Watson and White at the moment. I think that Watson and White have the potential to alter Australian cricket to a greater extent should they make it at test level, as a test-class allrounder is pretty much a holy grail of building a balanced competitive team; I just think Jaques is the more likely to make it happen.
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 28-12-2005, 09:45 AM in reply to Leafy Seadragon's post starting "I think that you should add that young..."
Allround Digger Allround Digger is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
My other team/s: Australia, NSW, Wests Ashfield
Posts: 4
I think mike hussey is a top player n he is showing that now but i think phil jaques even though he didnt show much in his debut is someone to look out for and hes only 26 hes got some good years ahead of him if he can keep up his recent form.
__________________
What is human life, but a game of cricket??
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 28-12-2005, 10:07 AM in reply to Oddo21's post "Australia"
tg123's Avatar
tg123 tg123 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: sydney
My other team/s: australia, speed blitz blues
Posts: 78
i think mike hussey because of his amazing ability to hit singles fours and sixes micheal clarke will be a good future plater same with phil jaques
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 02:43 AM.

Page generated in 0.576 seconds (62.96% PHP - 37.04% MySQL) with 13 queries

Partner Sites: - pakistancricketzone.com | Fantasy Cricket | Cricket World Cup Images | Cricket 24/7 | Third Umpire | Indian Cricket League

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0