| | |
| | |
| Welcome to the World-A-Team Cricket Forum. We promote friendly, good-natured, quality cricket discussion. |
| |||||||
| AUS Archived Threads 2005 Onwards. Austraia home forum. |
| View Poll Results: Who should open with Gilchrist? | |||
| Hayden |    | 6 | 66.67% |
| Watson |    | 0 | 0% |
| Jacques |    | 1 | 11.11% |
| Kattich |    | 0 | 0% |
| Other |    | 2 | 22.22% |
| Voters: 9. You may not vote on this poll | |||
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| ||||
| Strange tactics by Australia, IMHO. Watson as an opener when chasing a modest total? I don't see the point. And their best ODI batsmen, who's also one of the best in the world, comes in at 7, in the 42nd over of a 50 over game?! Seems daft, but then I am no expert. In my simple world, teams would build their ODI innings around chaps like Hussey.
__________________ A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes Mark Twain |
| ||||
| Hussey would have more to finish if he came in up the order. What a waste of a talented batsman. |
19-10-2006, 10:23 PM
in reply to darksideofthemoon's post starting "Hussey would have more to finish if he..." | ||||
| ||||
| The Hussey theory is the same as the Bevan theory, he is perfect for finish matches he usually has Symonds with him who can do the power hitting and is amazingly quick like Hussey. Hussey bats well with the tail and can straight away hit the ball as well as anyone. He would be a good opener but he also can help the team get ten runs an over in the last ten overs.
__________________ Bill Ponsford - The only one who could play in Bradman’s company and make it a duet. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Linear Mode
