Hide/show banner
Australia Cricket Forum

Welcome to the World-A-Team Cricket Forum. We promote friendly, good-natured, quality cricket discussion.
Go Back   World A-Team Cricket Forum > Australia Cricket Forum
Sitemap Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Contact Us Chat Room Shoutbox News Podcasts Fantasy Cricket

Australia Cricket Forum A forum for domestic cricket discussion.
Tell us about your favourite club in Australia. Who are the key players to watch?

Reply Without Quote
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 03-01-2007, 03:20 PM in reply to Roland Pink's post starting "I must be honest and I think that Clark..."
KennyG's Avatar
KennyG KennyG is offline
Big double-ton
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Victoria,Australia
My main national team: Australia
My other team/s: Victoria,St.K.F.C
Posts: 231
Clark at least will be a good bowler.
Maybe he will not be in McGrath class but he will be at least at the Harmison level.
__________________
" You don't want the truth,you can't handle the truth."
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 03-01-2007, 03:27 PM in reply to KennyG's post starting "Clark at least will be a good..."
Rachael Rachael is offline
Administrator
WAT selector
Selector-World XI (1980 onwards)
(ENG-captain) Passed Mike Atherton's 7728 Test runs
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Norfolk
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
Posts: 7,731
Quote:
Originally Posted by KennyG
Clark at least will be a good bowler.
I'd definitely back Clark ahead of Tait... and Lee will have to produce a lot more bowling of the sort he managed today (and a lot less of his usual rubbish) to retaining a higher spot in the pecking order. At the very least, Clark looks capable of doing the sort of job Fraser did for England for so long... and that's more than most international bowlers ever manage.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 03-01-2007, 03:54 PM in reply to butchering lee's post starting "There is hype surrounding someone and..."
Speedboy Salesman's Avatar
Speedboy Salesman Speedboy Salesman is offline
WAT Journalist
(ENG-captain) Passed W.G. Grace's 1098 Test runs
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Birmingham, England
My main national team: England
My other team/s: India, Canada, Warwickshire
Posts: 1,138
Send a message via MSN to Speedboy Salesman
Quote:
Originally Posted by butchering lee
Clark - has had a special year and looks like an excellent prospect now

But you could say the same about Panesar. But I suppose between Clark's situation and Panesar's situation, is that Clark has other bowlers to back him and England don't
__________________
Frank Skinner: "You know when Glenn McGrath trod on that cricket ball? Don't you wish it would've been a landmine?"
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 03-01-2007, 10:44 PM in reply to Speedboy Salesman's post starting "But you could say the same about..."
darksideofthemoon's Avatar
darksideofthemoon darksideofthemoon is offline
WAT selector - England A 2005
(AUS) Passed Geoff Lawson's 894 Test runs
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: London
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Lancs, England A Team
Posts: 895
I think the Aussie bowlers wouldn't quite look so good if they had to bowl to their batting line up. Whereas our bowlers would look great bowling at our batting line up.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 04-01-2007, 02:28 PM in reply to Roland Pink's post starting "I must be honest and I think that Clark..."
greg's Avatar
greg greg is offline
Selector of WAT Cricketers of the Year 2005
WAT England A Selector-2005
(AUS-captain) Passed Bill Lawry's 5234 Test runs
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Salop/England
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Yorkshire
Posts: 5,242
Well if he is overrated how come he is the leading wicket taker in this series?

Is it all just luck?
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 05-01-2007, 11:21 PM in reply to greg's post starting "Well if he is overrated how come he is..."
cantplaycantalk cantplaycantalk is offline
(PAK) Passed Abdul Qadir's 1029 Test runs
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
My main national team: I support more than one national team
My other team/s: Durham, England, West Indies
Posts: 1,032
The England attack which Australia faced in England was 4 good seamers in good form with no weak links, that creates pressure and makes it easier for all the individual bowlers. That is a similar situation to which Australia have been in during this series. No weak links and 2 all time greats in the bowling attack. Makes it a heck of a lot easier for Lee and Clark to appear better than they actually are. It is questionable if they would have had the same impact were the attack Clark, Lee, Tait and Magill compared to Jones, Flintoff, Harmison, Hoggard and Panesar (all fit and in reasonable form)
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 05-01-2007, 11:45 PM in reply to cantplaycantalk's post starting "The England attack which Australia..."
draexem draexem is offline
Maiden century
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 109
Actually, it would have been Clark, Lee, Johnson, MacGill. And this bowling attack would have had a similar impact as MacGill can perform at a very high standard, and Clark and Lee bowled very well in South Africa without McGrath.
Reply With Quote
Reply Without Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 02:51 PM.

Page generated in 0.439 seconds (60.51% PHP - 39.49% MySQL) with 13 queries

Partner Sites: - pakistancricketzone.com | Fantasy Cricket | Cricket World Cup Images | Cricket 24/7 | Third Umpire | Indian Cricket League

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0