| | |
| |
| Welcome to the World-A-Team Cricket Forum. We promote friendly, good-natured, quality cricket discussion. |
| |||||||
| Australia Cricket Forum A forum for domestic cricket discussion. Tell us about your favourite club in Australia. Who are the key players to watch? |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | ||||
| ||||
| Clark at least will be a good bowler. Maybe he will not be in McGrath class but he will be at least at the Harmison level.
__________________ " You don't want the truth,you can't handle the truth." |
| |||
| Quote:
|
| | ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
__________________ Frank Skinner: "You know when Glenn McGrath trod on that cricket ball? Don't you wish it would've been a landmine?" |
| | ||||
| ||||
| I think the Aussie bowlers wouldn't quite look so good if they had to bowl to their batting line up. Whereas our bowlers would look great bowling at our batting line up. |
| |
| Well if he is overrated how come he is the leading wicket taker in this series? Is it all just luck? |
| |||
| The England attack which Australia faced in England was 4 good seamers in good form with no weak links, that creates pressure and makes it easier for all the individual bowlers. That is a similar situation to which Australia have been in during this series. No weak links and 2 all time greats in the bowling attack. Makes it a heck of a lot easier for Lee and Clark to appear better than they actually are. It is questionable if they would have had the same impact were the attack Clark, Lee, Tait and Magill compared to Jones, Flintoff, Harmison, Hoggard and Panesar (all fit and in reasonable form) |
| | |||
| |||
| Actually, it would have been Clark, Lee, Johnson, MacGill. And this bowling attack would have had a similar impact as MacGill can perform at a very high standard, and Clark and Lee bowled very well in South Africa without McGrath. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |