| | |
| |
| Welcome to the World-A-Team Cricket Forum. We promote friendly, good-natured, quality cricket discussion. |
| |||||||
| Battrick If you have a Battrick team then this is the place to discuss strategy and management issues. |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | ||||
| ||||
| As I stated before, I think it would be a mistake to move up to the next level while our debt is spiralling out of contol. We should stay at this level and build a more balanced team instead of relying on the same key players. We need to develop a bowling attack that can take all 10 wickets of good sides. Some of our bowlers can bowl economically but we'd be a better side with wicket-takers.
__________________ Administrator |
| ||||
| This is a good point. We are at least one quality seam bowler short of being a decent side. I don't think that getting promoted would necessarily mean an equivalent increase in attendances either. I definitely think selling Binnion would be good, and replacing him with a 'strong' batsman/keeper and a 'strong' seam bowler. A 'strong' player would cost approximately £500k. If we sell Binnion, then whenever anyone logs onto battrick, could they do a search of the transfer list and look out for a 'strong' batsman, bowler or keeper whose current price is less than £250k. If we sell Binnion for £1m (which is a minimum to my mind) then we should be able to purchase three players to replace him for £750k, leaving us a cash flow benefit of £250k. |
| | ||||
| ||||
| Just to underline how weak our bowling is in the first 10 overs I've done a comparison with Oldham CC who appears to have the best opening attack in our league. In 10 overs: Connells Estates CC Carter/Castle: 0-49 Won Carter/Castle: 2-54 Won Carter/Castle: 2-54 Lost Carter/Castle: 0-58 Won Carter/Castle: 1-45 Lost Carter/Castle: 1-42 Won Carter/Castle: 1-27 Won Carter/Castle: 0-38 Won Carter/Castle: 0-40 Won Leader/Castle: 0-47 Won Ave: 64.85 Oldham CC Corry/Whaley: 0-26 Lost Corry/Whaley: 2-37 Won Corry/Whaley: 2-38 Won Corry/Whaley: 5-35 Won Corry/Whaley: 4-41 Won Corry/Whaley: 4-35 Won Corry/Whaley: 4-36 Won Corry/Whaley: 2-29 Won Corry/Whaley: 1-55 Lost Corry/Whaley: 2-49 Lost Ave: 14.65 The average is calculated by dividing the total runs with the wickets taken. Our average of 64.85 is 4 times greater than Oldham CC due to fewer wickets taken and conceding more runs. Whaley is a medium pacer while Corry is fast-medium. Most of the pitches we play on in our league are Green, therefore, we should also aim to bowl medium-to-medium fast to control the ball better. Carter is a spinner which is inappropriate to open the bowling on green pitches. Leader is fast and expensive on green pitches. I suggest we keep Leader because Lancaster Bombers have a Hard and Fast pitch. But he shouldn't open on green pitches. I suggest we look for a one or two seam bowlers who average less than 20, strike-rate less than 30 and economy less than 4. If we play Carter he can play a containing role with his spin and Leader can bowl as 4th bowler. With Leader we should try not to give him 10 overs on green pitches.
__________________ Administrator |
| ||||
| I think my attack on most green pitches would be: Mushtaq Macey Curtis Castle Gaz Leader Andrew Midworth Rob Wright I notice Andy has rested Castle from bowling in the next match although he's still batting. Wright, the LFM bowler gets an opportunity as b2. Andy continues to bowl the spinner in the first 10 overs. Not sure I agree with this strategy as I mentioned in a previous post. What's the thinking with these bowling orders, Andy? Midworth b1 - spin Wright b2 Antoine b3 - spin Leader b4 Macey b5
__________________ Administrator |
| ||||
| Areas of improvement: The only two areas of improvement from the start of the season have been the Top Order which improved from mediocre to competent and the spin bowling which improved from mediocre to competent. Reporter's Summary - first match Connells Estates CC Top Order: mediocre Middle Order: woeful Lower Order: worthless Seam Bowling: feeble Spin Bowling: mediocre Fielding: woeful Connells Estates CC - most recent match Top Order: competent Middle Order: woeful Lower Order: worthless Seam Bowling: feeble Spin Bowling: competent Fielding: woeful
__________________ Administrator Last edited by admin : 03-12-2005 at 09:50 AM. |
| ||||
| Quote:
Have you noticed that there's a couple of players in our first team - Roy Mayo specifically - who are not good at either discipline! |
| | ||||
| ||||
| Andy, you had these players on the transfer list: Maurice Woozley 29/11/2005 18:53:17 £0 Roy Mayo 29/11/2005 19:01:02 £0 Aaron Ricketts 29/11/2005 19:01:42 £0 I notice they are still with us and costing us money. Why don't we dump them?
__________________ Administrator |
| ||||
| I sacked Ricketts and Woozley - they would never play a game. I've retained Mayo in the short term until we can find some half decent replacements - hopefully from this week's youth pull! |
| | ||||
| ||||
| You must have fired them today, Andy, because they were there this morning. Good move, anyway. How do you check the Youth Pull? Is there a link or are you notified by email?
__________________ Administrator |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |