Hide/show banner
Fantasy Cricket

Welcome to the World-A-Team Cricket Forum. We promote friendly, good-natured, quality cricket discussion.
Go Back   World A-Team Cricket Forum > Bangladesh Cricket Forum > BD Archived Threads 2005 Onwards.
Sitemap Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Contact Us Chat Room Shoutbox News Podcasts Fantasy Cricket

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 14-01-2005, 11:00 AM in reply to vvvrulz's post starting "But if there were to be two tiers, how..."
flanflinger's Avatar
flanflinger flanflinger is offline
WAT England A Selector-2005
WAT Journalist  Read my Articles
(AUS-captain) Passed Kim Hughes' 4415 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Bristol
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Surrey and the Mighty Mighty Quinns
Posts: 4,450
and playing against the big teams is helping them..

They have played 35 Tests, of which they have lost 30. Of which 20 have been lost by an innings, and have 7 been lost by more than 7 wickets.

Of the draws only one was against an established Test nation - The West Indies. The other draws and the win were against Zimbabwe.

Is being thrashed almost every time they play helping develop them? Wouldn't it be better to play with sides where thay have an opportunity to develop their skills? The problem with Test Cricket is that you are either a Test nation or you arenot, there is not intermidiate step, and some of the ICC Teams are no better than club sides. Doesn't it make sense to have two tiers where the best ICC teams can earn the chance to play against the best Test nations - on merit?


PS

Zimabwe by the way after 35 Tests had lost just 17 games, and they had beaten Pakistan (twice) and India...

Sri Lanka had lost 18 and won against Inidia and Pakistan

Bangladesh have lost 30 and won against a very weak Zimbabwe.

To me I don't see Test status is actually helping them

Last edited by flanflinger : 14-01-2005 at 11:14 AM.
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 14-01-2005, 11:21 AM in reply to flanflinger's post starting "and playing against the big teams is..."
Occasional Fan Occasional Fan is offline
Moderator
(NZ-captain) Passed Martin Crowe's 5444 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Prague, Czech Republic
My main national team: England
Posts: 5,500
FF, this is one of those things which is not possible to measure objectively - it's only a matter of opinion. I personally think that in the long run - which is also not something which is measurable objectively, of course! - Bangladesh will benefit from facing the big guns. I'm not in favour of a two tier structure either. Bangladesh's wins will come in good time, and Zimbabwe's will return.

Just to add to your stats, after 35 tests, New Zealand had no wins at all to their name. They had ten more games to wait before that happened. (That adds nothing to my position and takes nothing from yours, of course, but it does just make the point that Bangladesh were not the slowest to find a win after entering the test arena.)
__________________
Money won't buy you friends. But it gets you a better class of enemy.
Spike Milligan
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 14-01-2005, 12:22 PM in reply to Occasional Fan's post starting "FF, this is one of those things which..."
flanflinger's Avatar
flanflinger flanflinger is offline
WAT England A Selector-2005
WAT Journalist  Read my Articles
(AUS-captain) Passed Kim Hughes' 4415 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Bristol
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Surrey and the Mighty Mighty Quinns
Posts: 4,450
Quote:
Originally Posted by Occasional Fan
Just to add to your stats, after 35 tests, New Zealand had no wins at all to their name.
True, but they had drawn 18 and lost just 17 (7 by an innings and two by more than 7 wickets). It is not just the lack of wins, but how often and badly they lose. This was not the case with the Kiwis, atleast they were competitive.

My fear is this, if they do not start winning regularily how long will it be before the Bangladeshi public get fed up and lose intrest? They will only play Zimbabwe once every two or three years, that means they are going to have to see a lot of losses.

I don't think there is a case for revoking Test status, instead I would give that status to Holland, Scotland, UAE, Kenya and Canada, then I would create a second Tier which would feed into the top Tier. This would make the games Bangladesh (and Zimbabwe) play more competitive and keep the people of Bangladesh happy.

At the same time this will give them regular Cricket (let be honest if it wasn't for the Future tours programme, Bangladesh would not get an invite to England or Australia), it would also devleop the game in the other countries mentined.

My view is that a Two Tier Cricket would develop a global game better than the system we have currently. Wherby Teams would achive the top level through Merit and not through Poltical engineering.
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 14-01-2005, 12:36 PM in reply to flanflinger's post starting "True, but they had drawn 18 and lost..."
Occasional Fan Occasional Fan is offline
Moderator
(NZ-captain) Passed Martin Crowe's 5444 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Prague, Czech Republic
My main national team: England
Posts: 5,500
Quote:
Originally Posted by flanflinger
My fear is this, if they do not start winning regularily how long will it be before the Bangladeshi public get fed up and lose intrest?
About the same time as hell freezes over, I think.
__________________
Money won't buy you friends. But it gets you a better class of enemy.
Spike Milligan
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 14-01-2005, 04:55 PM in reply to Occasional Fan's post starting "About the same time as hell freezes..."
admin's Avatar
admin admin is offline
Administrator
(WI) Passed Jeffery Dujon's 3322 Test runs
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sydney, Australia
My main national team: Australia
My other team/s: England
Posts: 3,339
Send a message via Yahoo to admin Send a message via Skype™ to admin
Off-topic

I'm going off-topic here deliberately to make a point and I'll split these posts later to preserve the original discussion. This is a frank discussion involving some opposition supporters. My question is why are these negative points being made by opposition supporters in the Bangladesh forum? Is it to drive Bangladesh fans off this board? In my opinion, there has been little friendliness shown by opposition supporters in this thread. Let me remind everyone that the country forums are for the fans of that country who have indicated their allegiance via their My Team/s choices. The country forums are not neutral forums so please don't treat them as such. Opposition supporters are only welcome on the Bangladesh forum if they post in a friendly manner. If you can't adhere to that board policy then post only to your own forum or the neutral forums. If you oppose this policy then state your view here.

Let me further add that I get quite annoyed having to move threads from the country forums to the neutral forums due to friendly discussions turning unfriendly by opposition supporters. I am prepared to ban opposition supporters from posting to any country forum in which they have displayed a clear bias against that country by constantly posting in an unfriendly manner. Please report such people to me and I will rid them from your forum so you can continue to enjoy your forum in a pleasant atmosphere.

To reiterate: the board is structured with neutral forums and fan-based forums. When posting a threadstarter on a neutral forum the assumption is that you don't mind a frank discussion with opposition supporters. However, a threadstarter posted on your own country forum is primarily for discussion between fellow fans of your forum. Opposition supporters are welcome to participate as long as they don't spoil the enjoyment of the discussion between fans. If moderation is called for opposition supporters don't have a defence if a fan is annoyed by a comment. Not even, "but my point is entirely valid". Sorry, comments by opposition supporters should not spoil the enjoyment of fans on their own forum, no matter how valid. That's why neutral forums exist - for that type of frank discussion.

Please let me know if I am not making myself clear because I have been saying this for months now.
__________________
Administrator

Last edited by admin : 14-01-2005 at 06:03 PM.
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 09-02-2005, 01:06 PM in reply to admin's post "Off-topic"
Hasib Hasib is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
My other team/s: Bangladesh
Posts: 14
Nice to see some ppl here is standing up for bangladesh... in some of the other international forums i have been to its totally anti- Bangladesh.

Thank You.
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 09-02-2005, 01:29 PM in reply to Hasib's post starting "Nice to see some ppl here is standing..."
Ernest's Avatar
Ernest Ernest is online now
Administrator
WAT England A Selector
Selector-World XI (1980 onwards)
(WI-captain) Passed Brian Lara's 11953 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Lancashire
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
My other team/s: ::All "Test" Playing Nations
Posts: 13,606
Send a message via Yahoo to Ernest Send a message via Skype™ to Ernest
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hasib
Nice to see some ppl here is standing up for bangladesh... in some of the other international forums i have been to its totally anti- Bangladesh.

Thank You.
Not here,Welome to the board Hasib, looking forward to Bangladesh coming to England.
__________________
Ern
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 11-02-2005, 06:42 AM in reply to Ernest's post starting "Not here,Welome to the board Hasib,..."
Paoli's Avatar
Paoli Paoli is offline
(WI) Passed Jeffery Dujon's 3322 Test runs
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
My main national team: Australia
My other team/s: Newcastle United
Posts: 3,330
A little blow today when the Cricinfo announced that Zimbabwe and Bangladesh could be playing only home test series soon under an ICC law.

Should be quashed. Bangla are on the rise. And there is more confidence than ever that Zims rebels will be back.
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 11-02-2005, 07:15 AM in reply to Paoli's post starting "A little blow today when the Cricinfo..."
Occasional Fan Occasional Fan is offline
Moderator
(NZ-captain) Passed Martin Crowe's 5444 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Prague, Czech Republic
My main national team: England
Posts: 5,500
Like you, Paoli, I really hope they smack this idea firmly out of the ground.
__________________
Money won't buy you friends. But it gets you a better class of enemy.
Spike Milligan
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 11-02-2005, 08:21 AM in reply to Occasional Fan's post starting "Like you, Paoli, I really hope they..."
Hasib Hasib is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
My other team/s: Bangladesh
Posts: 14
The biggest problem for Bangladesh is they play better cricket in Away games. The real reason behind this is that cricket boards in other countries feel a Bangladesh won't generate a lotta intrest. So they will be at a lose when it comes to money. Well this hasn't happened as of yet. Furthermore... if the lose does happen... it will still be an investment... as by playing big teams Bangladesh will improve and become more compatitive. And more compatitive on the scene will gentarate more money for them in the future.
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 12:02 AM.

Page generated in 0.580 seconds (63.71% PHP - 36.29% MySQL) with 13 queries

Partner Sites: - pakistancricketzone.com | Fantasy Cricket | Cricket World Cup Images | Cricket 24/7 | Third Umpire | Indian Cricket League

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0