Hide/show banner
Fantasy Cricket

Welcome to the World-A-Team Cricket Forum. We promote friendly, good-natured, quality cricket discussion.
Go Back   World A-Team Cricket Forum > England Cricket Forum > ENG Archived Threads 2004
Sitemap Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Contact Us Chat Room Shoutbox News Podcasts Fantasy Cricket

View Poll Results: If England could transfer an international player who would you want
Muttiah Muralitharan 6 18.18%
Raul Dravid 0 0%
Ricky Ponting 0 0%
Shane Warne 13 39.39%
Sachin Tendulkar 4 12.12%
Brian Lara 0 0%
Adam Gilchrist 5 15.15%
Jaques Kallis 2 6.06%
Shaoib Ahktar 1 3.03%
Mathew Hayden 0 0%
VVS Laxman 0 0%
Glen McGrath 2 6.06%
Inzaman Ul Haq 0 0%
Virrinder Shewag 0 0%
Voters: 33. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 21-11-2004, 08:26 PM in reply to Ernest's post starting "Warne would make England the finished..."
Beny's Avatar
Beny Beny is offline
WAT Australia A Selector 2004
WAT Journalist  Read my Articles
(WI-captain) Passed Jimmy Adams' 3012 Test runs
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
My main national team: Australia
My other team/s: Victoria
Posts: 3,041
Send a message via MSN to Beny
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ernest 24632
Warne would make England the finished article, they would be untouchable.


Ern
Ohhh God.
__________________
It's hard enough to remember my opinions, without remembering my reasons for them!
Nietzsche
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 21-11-2004, 08:34 PM in reply to Beny's post starting "Ohhh God.:rolleyes:"
Ernest's Avatar
Ernest Ernest is online now
Administrator
WAT England A Selector
Selector-World XI (1980 onwards)
(WI-captain) Passed Brian Lara's 11953 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Lancashire
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
My other team/s: ::All "Test" Playing Nations
Posts: 13,625
Send a message via Yahoo to Ernest Send a message via Skype™ to Ernest
A Prayer Answered!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beny
Ohhh God.
Yes can I help?.
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 22-11-2004, 10:42 AM in reply to Zainub's post starting "I surrender Don. You win. You're not..."
acker's Avatar
acker acker is offline
Selector-World XI (1980 onwards)
(ENG) Passed Trevor 'Barnacle' Bailey's 2290 Test runs
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: now SW New South Wales
My main national team: Australia
My other team/s: Western Bulldogs
Posts: 2,294
Well , I would never have believed the Professor of Telecomunications with a PHD in text messaging Dr S . Warne

would be in front at this stage.

Spookily a TV show stated here in Oz when I started wring this post , with Kim Hughes being interviewed.
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 22-11-2004, 11:27 AM in reply to acker's post starting "Well , I would never have believed the..."
Oliver's Avatar
Oliver Oliver is offline
(SA) Passed Graeme Pollock's 2256 Test runs
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: South West London
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Tottenham Hotspur
Posts: 2,270
One from that list? Not fair.

I went for Tendulkar. Bye-bye Butcher.

I'd happily have chosen Shane Warne as well. Bye-bye Ashley.

But Tendulkar is more important. That is a fit little master. Not the current one suffering from tennis elbow.

England's top order batting all average around the 45 mark. That's not good enough in Test cricket. I think they are improving and a whole bunch of Test victories where the side are not bowled out twice will substantially improve their averages in the long term.

But it is here (in the batting) where England are most defficient. The argument thereafter is which one of those guys should one pick. Matthew Hayden was quite short odds with me, and Virender Sehwag even Raul Dravid. Not Inzamam-ul-Haq. And I'm afraid VVS Laxman is beginning to look like a one series wonder. Brian Lara too, is not the player he was, four billion on a dead pitch playing for a draw in a dead rubber was not the performance of a truly great player - it was the performance of a very selfish and single-minded captain with tremendous powers of concentration.

I go for Sachin.
__________________
Red-it, Red-it, Read it and wept
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 22-11-2004, 11:35 AM in reply to Oliver's post "One from that list? Not fair."
The Worker's Avatar
The Worker The Worker is offline
Made a start
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: At Work
My main national team: England
Posts: 41
I'd go for McGrath, given the lack of strength in depth in our bowling attack. Handy batsman too !!
Don't see the need for a batsman, as this is the one area where we are starting to get competition for places.
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 22-11-2004, 11:42 AM in reply to The Worker's post starting "I'd go for McGrath, given the lack of..."
Maranello's Avatar
Maranello Maranello is offline
Moderator
WAT Pakistan A Selector
WAT selector - England A 2005
(PAK-captain) Passed Mushtaq Mohammad's 3643 Test runs
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Dubai
My main national team: Pakistan
Posts: 3,700
Surely McGrath is an all-rounder now?
__________________
A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes
Mark Twain
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 22-11-2004, 11:59 AM in reply to acker's post "Who would you buy for England if you..."
Rachael Rachael is offline
Administrator
WAT selector
Selector-World XI (1980 onwards)
(ENG-captain) Passed Mike Atherton's 7728 Test runs
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Norfolk
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
Posts: 7,835
Surely England would be looking to pick a player they expected to be a Test player for the next 15 years... which rules out many on that list.

Despite the fact that he's relatively unproven, my wish list would start with Michael Clarke... but if not him then perhaps Danish Kaneria... or perhaps the young player who has impressed me mot of all over the past 12 months: Dwayne Bravo.

Of those on the list.. Sehwag is surely the best long term prospect...

In terms of who England could most do with right now though... Shaun Pollock would HAVE to be the number one choice as a straight swap for Jones / Anderson: great guy to take the new ball with Harmison, fantastic bat to come in at 7 and give us the depth of batting we so desperate need to compensate for the sheer lack of consistency int he top 6.

Of those one th elist.. and looking for immediate impact... Rahul Dravid (wthout doubt, to my mind, the no 1 bat in the world right now) might just sneak it on the basis that England batting needs a "wall" player... but that would be a hard decision to make when the alternative is to replace Jones/Anderson with Gillespie / McGrath.

Sure, Warne or Muralitheran in addition to Giles would be cool... but let's get real: with Warne or Murali in the side we WOULD be taking 2 spinners everywhere.. 'cos there's no way we'd drop Vaughan's able lieutenant Giles ahead of the rather less than dependable Anderson or Jones.
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 22-11-2004, 12:09 PM in reply to Rachael's post starting "Surely England would be looking to pick..."
Milo Milo is offline
World XI (1980 onwards) -World XI (1980 onwards)
(ENG) Passed George Lohmann's 1205 Test runs
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
My other team/s: England
Posts: 1,236
I voted for Warne - not as an addition for Giles - but for a replacement. I fully expect Giles to be irrelevant in South Africa and for the Aussies to bash him around the grounds next year. One good summer, and we suddenly forget how poor he had been. England's batting clearly needs bolstering, but one player for another I do think would have too much of an impact (with the possible excpetion of Hayden for Trescothick). Tests are won by the bowlers - and Warne would give us a good chance (with Harmison, Flintoff and Hoggard) of getting 20 in many of the tests we would play.

The only other alternative would be McGrath/Pollock/Gillespie for Jones as you said.
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 23-11-2004, 02:24 PM in reply to Milo's post starting "I voted for Warne - not as an addition..."
Chuck Palumbo Chuck Palumbo is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Arsenal,and Warickshire
Posts: 298
Warne without a doubt- The greatest spinner there has ever been and the most influential bowler ever.
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 16-12-2004, 11:42 PM in reply to Chuck Palumbo's post starting "Warne without a doubt- The greatest..."
*Ben* *Ben* is offline
Made a start
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Wellington, New zealand
My main national team: New Zealand
My other team/s: New Zealand, Wellington, North City, Aotea College
Posts: 44
Send a message via MSN to *Ben*
I voted for the mighty chuker not muri though
basiclly bacause hes ripped through the aussies now

Last edited by *Ben* : 16-12-2004 at 11:43 PM. Reason: spelling
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 04:39 PM.

Page generated in 0.601 seconds (68.96% PHP - 31.04% MySQL) with 14 queries

Partner Sites: - pakistancricketzone.com | Fantasy Cricket | Cricket World Cup Images | Cricket 24/7 | Third Umpire | Indian Cricket League

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0