Hide/show banner
Fantasy Cricket

Welcome to the World-A-Team Cricket Forum. We promote friendly, good-natured, quality cricket discussion.
Go Back   World A-Team Cricket Forum > England Cricket Forum > ENG Archived Threads 2004
Sitemap Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Contact Us Chat Room Shoutbox News Podcasts Fantasy Cricket

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 23-11-2004, 04:31 PM
flanflinger's Avatar
flanflinger flanflinger is offline
WAT England A Selector-2005
WAT Journalist  Read my Articles
(AUS-captain) Passed Kim Hughes' 4415 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Bristol
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Surrey and the Mighty Mighty Quinns
Posts: 4,450
Possible way out - Zimbabwe ban cricket journalists

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/cric...nd/4036335.stm



Quote:
Originally Posted by BBC
Zimbabwe ban cricket journalists

The BBC and a number of national newspapers have been denied entry to Zimbabwe to cover England's forthcoming cricket tour.

The Zimbabwe government has denied access to the Times, Telegraph, Sun, Mirror and their Sunday versions. A five-match one-day series is due to start on Friday - England are currently in Namibia.

The decision could put the whole tour in jeopardy as international cricket rules require media access for all.


  #2 (permalink)  
Old 23-11-2004, 04:39 PM in reply to flanflinger's post "Possible way out - Zimbabwe ban cricket..."
Occasional Fan Occasional Fan is offline
Moderator
(NZ-captain) Passed Martin Crowe's 5444 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Prague, Czech Republic
My main national team: England
Posts: 5,518
Just heard this on BBCWS, with the additional comment that the press applied for visas through the ECB and ZC some two months ago. The applications were turned down today. Jonathan Agnew comments that in his view the ECB now has no option but to withdraw. He may have a point, but he did not comment on the role of the ICC, whose own rules require that press access be granted. Surely the ICC should now scrap this fiasco. Curiously, however, the ICC's spokesman says "In some ways it depends on the bilateral agreement between Zimbabwe Cricket and the ECB - which is outside the ICC." Not for the first time, I wonder what the ICC is actually for.

Last edited by Occasional Fan : 23-11-2004 at 04:43 PM.
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 23-11-2004, 04:42 PM in reply to flanflinger's post "Possible way out - Zimbabwe ban cricket..."
Richie Benauds Love Child's Avatar
Richie Benauds Love Child Richie Benauds Love Child is offline
.
(PAK) Passed Mudassar Nazar's 4114 Test runs
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Sheffield
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Derbyshire
Posts: 4,158
The fiends have banned Aggers ! This is reason for a nuclear strike let alone calling the "cricket" series. I can see the reasoning of not letting John Simpson or the like who WILL (rightly) poke around and look for human rights abuses etc, but Aggers, Blowers and co will just comment on the appearance of the local buses and pigeon population.

Seriously though, if handled right, this could be the way out the ECB need......


...looks like we'll be playing in Zimbabwe then.
__________________
Nothing says "Obey Me" like a bloody head on a fence post!
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 23-11-2004, 04:45 PM in reply to Richie Benauds Love Child's post starting "The fiends have banned Aggers ! This is..."
flanflinger's Avatar
flanflinger flanflinger is offline
WAT England A Selector-2005
WAT Journalist  Read my Articles
(AUS-captain) Passed Kim Hughes' 4415 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Bristol
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Surrey and the Mighty Mighty Quinns
Posts: 4,450
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richie Benauds Love Child


...looks like we'll be playing in Zimbabwe then.
Too right, this may be the best way of aborting this tour, you can guarnantee that Morgan will mess it up...
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 23-11-2004, 05:00 PM in reply to flanflinger's post starting "Too right, this may be the best way of..."
Ernest's Avatar
Ernest Ernest is online now
Administrator
WAT England A Selector
Selector-World XI (1980 onwards)
(WI-captain) Passed Brian Lara's 11953 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Lancashire
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
My other team/s: ::All "Test" Playing Nations
Posts: 13,625
Send a message via Yahoo to Ernest Send a message via Skype™ to Ernest
I doubt the ECB will have the guts to make this Zimbabwe move go for them, did you see the non commital answer from the ECB, I wonder if the ECB really want to go or not.

Time for tough action, Zimbabwe no how weak we are, they are just trying to humiliate us, only one answer just fly home, don't pay any fines, and any team that don't want to play us, tell them to B***** off as well, teams will not be forming a line not to play us.

Ern
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 23-11-2004, 05:15 PM in reply to Ernest's post starting "I doubt the ECB will have the guts to..."
flanflinger's Avatar
flanflinger flanflinger is offline
WAT England A Selector-2005
WAT Journalist  Read my Articles
(AUS-captain) Passed Kim Hughes' 4415 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Bristol
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Surrey and the Mighty Mighty Quinns
Posts: 4,450
well just heard on the BBC24.. Morgan says it will go ahead!!

Knew it..

The man's a fool, he had the reason handed to him on a plate...
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 23-11-2004, 05:21 PM in reply to flanflinger's post starting "well just heard on the BBC24.. Morgan..."
Occasional Fan Occasional Fan is offline
Moderator
(NZ-captain) Passed Martin Crowe's 5444 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Prague, Czech Republic
My main national team: England
Posts: 5,518
I wonder how many members of the press corps he talked to before making his mind up? Look for a few more calls for his head in tomorrow's papers. Can't think there will be many volunteers to go looking for it, mind: where he has it the sun doesn't shine. No surprises, of course, but one of Richie Benaud's comments comes to mind: "What a fiasco."
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 23-11-2004, 05:24 PM in reply to Occasional Fan's post starting "I wonder how many members of the press..."
flanflinger's Avatar
flanflinger flanflinger is offline
WAT England A Selector-2005
WAT Journalist  Read my Articles
(AUS-captain) Passed Kim Hughes' 4415 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Bristol
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Surrey and the Mighty Mighty Quinns
Posts: 4,450
Quote:
Originally Posted by Occasional Fan
"What a fiasco."
I think that could easily apply to all aspects of Morgan's "Leadership"
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 23-11-2004, 05:27 PM in reply to flanflinger's post starting "I think that could easily apply to all..."
flanflinger's Avatar
flanflinger flanflinger is offline
WAT England A Selector-2005
WAT Journalist  Read my Articles
(AUS-captain) Passed Kim Hughes' 4415 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Bristol
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Surrey and the Mighty Mighty Quinns
Posts: 4,450
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew Walpole, the England and Wales Cricket Board spokesman travelling with the England team
This is an evolving situation. We have already taken this up with the International Cricket Council at the highest level. There are going to be intensive discussions in the next 24 hours.
I like the way dicsussions are still going ahead and yet Morgan has alreday concluded that the tour will go ahead.

Last edited by flanflinger : 23-11-2004 at 05:31 PM.
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 23-11-2004, 05:45 PM in reply to flanflinger's post starting "I like the way dicsussions are still..."
Occasional Fan Occasional Fan is offline
Moderator
(NZ-captain) Passed Martin Crowe's 5444 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Prague, Czech Republic
My main national team: England
Posts: 5,518
Presumably the only matter under discussion is whether or not the barred journalists will eventually be allowed in. To be honest, I have some misgivings about that anyway. I'd actually be quite happy if Aggers (for example) would say "OK, Mr President, I'll come, but only if you let me bring my colleague, Mr Simpson, as well. He knows sod all about cricket, so, if you don't mind, he'll just spend the week chatting to people around the country about other things."

I know these guys who have been barred are cricket correspondents, but they're all (probably) fully paid up members of the National Union of Journalists. So I'd also be quite happy if they had a look over the fence at the cricket grounds to see if they can find more interesting things to report outside the grounds than inside them. I think some of these journalists are honourable blokes, and they probably would have tried to do this - which is why they have been barred.
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 04:11 PM.

Page generated in 0.637 seconds (51.79% PHP - 48.21% MySQL) with 13 queries

Partner Sites: - pakistancricketzone.com | Fantasy Cricket | Cricket World Cup Images | Cricket 24/7 | Third Umpire | Indian Cricket League

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0