| | |
| |
| Welcome to the World-A-Team Cricket Forum. We promote friendly, good-natured, quality cricket discussion. |
| |||||||
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| ||||
| It's not like you've got nobody to replace them with. Bell and Pieterson look ready for a go. Perhaps It will actually be a good thing as one of these two really stand up to be the next big thing in English Cricket.
__________________ It's hard enough to remember my opinions, without remembering my reasons for them! Nietzsche |
| ||||
| Quote:
__________________ Ern |
| ||||
| Sometimes to gain you must lose. Why can you not play Pieterson with Flintoff? Is this guy never going to get a go whilst Flintoff is in the team?
__________________ It's hard enough to remember my opinions, without remembering my reasons for them! Nietzsche |
| |||
| Thorpe's clearly the top English bat at the moment.. and looks to be at his peak.. but my own feeling is that Butcher's best is still to come: he never impressed me in his early career.. and seemed no more than average in more recent years.. but of late I think he's actually been showing signs that he can be better than that: he's finally showing the one thing that always eluded him.. being the temperament to deliver when his contribution is really needed. Jury is still out though: Butcher needs a good winter. My own concerns are more with Tresco... who has never struck me as good enough to be a Test match opener (great ODI player, perhaps a Test no 6.. but a player in the mould of Hayden who just hasn't shown the ability to dominate against the new ball that Hayden has shown.. and who has hardly ever shown the technique and temperament to compensate in other ways, as Langer does). As I see it we're still short of openers: Strauss does it.. and does it OK at county level... but bats in the manner of a no 5 (nudging and nurdling the singes to rotate the strike, not waiting for the bad ball and punishing it); Tresco bats like a no 6 (little footwork, but a good eye and the ODI strokes to cash in when the attack is tired and the ball is soft); Vaughan has done it.. but seems best suited (temperamentally) to reacting to the tempo of an innings rather than to setting the tempo of an innings; Key can do it... but looks more like a no 3.. building big innings... but best protected from the new ball due to technical deficiencies. Bell does NOT open for his county.. but might actually be a better bet than any of them. Find a partner of similar callibre and then run the 3-4-5 as Key, Vaughan, Strauss and IF Flintoff genuinely CAN handle batting at 6 (or Jones can do that job: doesn't really matter which one masters it as long as one of them does) then great - but that's longer term. In the shorter term.. England are SURELY better off trusting to the experience of Tresco, Butcher and Thorpe (perhaps with Bell at 6). ps. Pietersen remains a great unknown.. but if he can be a Hick like no 3 (batting as Hick could have done, rather than as he DID do) then great. Seems quite likely, however, that he'll be more like Chris Gayle.... firing occasionally with devastating effect but rarely when really needed. I've nothing against trying one or two such players in a Test side.. but Flintoff and GO Jones look to be out of the same mould.. and Tresco's best game is much the same! Last edited by Rachael : 01-12-2004 at 11:01 PM. |
| ||||
| He is to much like Flintoff with his batting, Stroke makers if it not their day, get out, as a rule caught on the boundry, so it is to much of a gamble. Ian Bell, well we will have to see how well Butcher playes if he is recalled, but then Rob Key is next in line. Yes Flintoff good as he is, does limit your options to a degree like playing Pieterson.
__________________ Ern |
| ||||
| Ern you're starting to sound like Rachal complaining about the stroke makers! What would you call having Hayden,Gilly,lehamn,Clarke and Symonds all in a team? Ponting's not exactly a defensive batsmen either.
__________________ It's hard enough to remember my opinions, without remembering my reasons for them! Nietzsche |
| | ||||
| ||||
| Rachael with respect, you spoiled a really good post with saying maybe play Bell at 6, we all know that is the optimum place for Flintoff, he is not a number 5, and a man who was better than all comers this summer, just can't be played at 7, looked when he played at 7 before, bowlers could not wait to bowl at him, knowing a boundary catch would be iminent, no Flintoff by all commentators, is a true no 6. Trescothick I am not sure, he started his England career so well, but he is an opener, and I doubt dropping him down the order would work. The only option is for Vaughan to open again, and Tresco at 3, or drop him, but for whom?.
__________________ Ern |
| ||||
| Quote:
OK you have stroke makers, but apart from Clarke, they are all experienced. Off subject but Clarke has to prove himself, I know he has had a good start, but he has to keep it going. I like stroke makers
__________________ Ern |
| ||||
| I say get the paint out an draw him some feet on the pitch so that he can use them as guides. Quote:
__________________ It's hard enough to remember my opinions, without remembering my reasons for them! Nietzsche |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |