Hide/show banner
Fantasy Cricket

Welcome to the World-A-Team Cricket Forum. We promote friendly, good-natured, quality cricket discussion.
Go Back   World A-Team Cricket Forum > England Cricket Forum > ENG Archived Threads 2004
Sitemap Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Contact Us Chat Room Shoutbox News Podcasts Fantasy Cricket

View Poll Results: A good deal by the ECB?
Yes 5 27.78%
No 9 50.00%
Let's wait and see... 4 22.22%
Voters: 18. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 15-12-2004, 05:22 PM
flanflinger's Avatar
flanflinger flanflinger is offline
WAT England A Selector-2005
WAT Journalist  Read my Articles
(AUS-captain) Passed Kim Hughes' 4415 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Bristol
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Surrey and the Mighty Mighty Quinns
Posts: 4,450
A Good deal

Time for a poll...

The ECB says that transferiing rights to SKY is a good deal for English Cricket.

While Channel 5 have committed themselves to proper length highlights at a good time, it still means that those without SKY are unable to see live Cricket.

The big gain is £20m of extra cash, and Channel4 admitted they could not afford to pay as much as they did last time (which would have left a short-fall) so fincially it could be seen as a good deal.

so was it a good deal - you decide....

Last edited by flanflinger : 15-12-2004 at 05:31 PM.
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 15-12-2004, 05:32 PM in reply to flanflinger's post "A Good deal"
Richie Benauds Love Child's Avatar
Richie Benauds Love Child Richie Benauds Love Child is offline
.
(PAK) Passed Mudassar Nazar's 4114 Test runs
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Sheffield
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Derbyshire
Posts: 4,158
No. Had we been in a similar state to the WI who cant beat a drum right now, I'd take the money over covereage. BUT as we are looking pretty good and the moment I'd take better coverage.
__________________
Nothing says "Obey Me" like a bloody head on a fence post!
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 15-12-2004, 05:50 PM in reply to Richie Benauds Love Child's post starting "No. Had we been in a similar state to..."
flanflinger's Avatar
flanflinger flanflinger is offline
WAT England A Selector-2005
WAT Journalist  Read my Articles
(AUS-captain) Passed Kim Hughes' 4415 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Bristol
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Surrey and the Mighty Mighty Quinns
Posts: 4,450
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/cricket/4098827.stm

Quote:
Originally Posted by Giles Clarke
The current terrestrial bids, if accepted, would have resulted in a significant economic impact on cricket. Cuts would have had to have been made across all areas of the game.
From what they are saying (and they are not disclosing actual figures) the Terrestrial bid would have left them with a significant short-fall...

Last edited by flanflinger : 15-12-2004 at 05:53 PM.
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 15-12-2004, 05:53 PM in reply to flanflinger's post starting "http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/cricket/..."
Occasional Fan Occasional Fan is offline
Moderator
(NZ-captain) Passed Martin Crowe's 5444 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Prague, Czech Republic
My main national team: England
Posts: 5,517
But then, as has been said in other contexts, they would say that, wouldn't they? What is beyond dispute is that cricket has a good deal more money to spend as a result of this deal than it would otherwise have had.
__________________
Money won't buy you friends. But it gets you a better class of enemy.
Spike Milligan
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 15-12-2004, 06:11 PM in reply to flanflinger's post "A Good deal"
Alison's Avatar
Alison Alison is offline
(ENG) Passed John Snow's 772 Test runs
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Plymouth
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Somerset
Posts: 788
Thumbs down

In my opinion this is a terrible deal, not simply because all live cricket will be on subscription only tv, but mainly because they've given the highlights to a channel that not all of the counrty can receive, which means that anyone who can't afford Sky, and lives in an area which doesn't receive Channel 5, will not be able to watch any cricket after next summer! How they can truthfully and legitimately claim that it is a good deal is completely beyond me.
__________________
umeiV luphqhsesqe, allh luph umwn eiV caran genhsetai.
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 15-12-2004, 07:37 PM in reply to Alison's post starting "In my opinion this is a terrible deal,..."
Richie Benauds Love Child's Avatar
Richie Benauds Love Child Richie Benauds Love Child is offline
.
(PAK) Passed Mudassar Nazar's 4114 Test runs
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Sheffield
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Derbyshire
Posts: 4,158
A £40 digibox might help matters for you alison, and theres no charges per month. You'll get 5 then.

But how much money are the ECB getting then ?
__________________
Nothing says "Obey Me" like a bloody head on a fence post!
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 15-12-2004, 07:55 PM in reply to Richie Benauds Love Child's post starting "A £40 digibox might help matters for..."
Alison's Avatar
Alison Alison is offline
(ENG) Passed John Snow's 772 Test runs
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Plymouth
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Somerset
Posts: 788
Right now I don't care how much money the ECB get, I think it's possible to get digital where I live, but what if you live somewhere where you can't get Five or Digital? This is what really gets to me about this deal, they've given all live cricket to subscription-only tv, and given the highlights to a channel that I think 20% of the country (that's the figure I've heard) can't receive, How on earth do they expect anyone to become interested with that kind of coverage? I'm wondering whether I should bother following cricket after next summer if I'm not able to watch any of it? Granted that may just be immediate reaction, because I'm so upset about it, but how is anyone who doesn't already follow cricket going to get inetersetd after next summer? It's not played in school, unless you can afford to go to a private school, there won't be any live criket on terrestrial tv, and even the highlights will be on a channel that a substantial number of people can't get!
__________________
umeiV luphqhsesqe, allh luph umwn eiV caran genhsetai.
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 15-12-2004, 07:56 PM in reply to flanflinger's post "A Good deal"
Ernest's Avatar
Ernest Ernest is offline
Administrator
WAT England A Selector
Selector-World XI (1980 onwards)
(WI-captain) Passed Brian Lara's 11953 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Lancashire
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
My other team/s: ::All "Test" Playing Nations
Posts: 13,620
Send a message via Yahoo to Ernest Send a message via Skype™ to Ernest
One thing wrong with your poll ff, why wait and see, we all have crystal balls, no comments Goaty.
__________________
Ern
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 15-12-2004, 07:57 PM in reply to Alison's post starting "Right now I don't care how much money..."
Andy Mellon's Avatar
Andy Mellon Andy Mellon is offline
Moderator
WAT selector - England A 2005
WAT New Zealand A Selector
WAT Journalist  Read my Articles
(NZ-captain) Passed Ken Rutherford's 2465 Test runs
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Wellington, NZ
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Essex and New Zealand
Posts: 2,477
Send a message via Yahoo to Andy Mellon
I live somewhere you can't get 5 or freeview and I can't get sky either! Well, at least I can still get TMS!
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 15-12-2004, 07:59 PM in reply to Ernest's post starting "One thing wrong with your poll ff, why..."
Alison's Avatar
Alison Alison is offline
(ENG) Passed John Snow's 772 Test runs
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Plymouth
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Somerset
Posts: 788
But if you have a crystal ball, surely you can answer either yes or no?
__________________
umeiV luphqhsesqe, allh luph umwn eiV caran genhsetai.
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 02:35 AM.

Page generated in 0.534 seconds (66.93% PHP - 33.07% MySQL) with 14 queries

Partner Sites: - pakistancricketzone.com | Fantasy Cricket | Cricket World Cup Images | Cricket 24/7 | Third Umpire | Indian Cricket League

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0