| | |
| | |
| Welcome to the World-A-Team Cricket Forum. We promote friendly, good-natured, quality cricket discussion. |
| |||||||
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
27-04-2004, 06:57 PM
in reply to Kirsty Harris's post starting "Scott
Yep the world would be a dull..." | |||
| |||
| Kirsty LOL! I wouldn't go as far as to say that - apparently my case for dropping Trescothick is 'rather slim' according to one poster here! But sadly, I think Giles's place is going to be under some pressure fairly shortly, even more so if the batting starts firing as it should! Scott |
|
27-04-2004, 06:58 PM
in reply to Scott-Wozniak's post starting "Kirsty
LOL! I wouldn't go as far as to..." | ||||
| ||||
| Leaves a vaughan with a long tail to manage though scott (Cue immature sniggers) |
|
27-04-2004, 07:01 PM
in reply to Scott-Wozniak's post starting "Kirsty
LOL! I wouldn't go as far as to..." | ||||
| ||||
| But hey, many (in fact almost all, apart from the England selection panel) people would say my case for keeping Giles in the side is 'rather slim' too!! Don't let other people's views put you off!!! |
|
27-04-2004, 07:06 PM
in reply to Kirsty Harris's post starting "But hey, many (in fact almost all,..." | |||
| |||
| Kirsty Well Giles would help his cause no end if every once and a while he actually managed to get a ball to turn! Whoops, I don't beleive I said that!  Scott |
|
27-04-2004, 07:08 PM
in reply to Kirsty Harris's post starting "But hey, many (in fact almost all,..." | ||||
| ||||
| To paraphrase the cricket authority that is mel gibson in lethal weapon The case for excluding tresco is slim, the case for including ashly giles is anorexic. |
|
27-04-2004, 07:13 PM
in reply to Scott-Wozniak's post starting "Kirsty
Well Giles would help his cause..." | ||||
| ||||
| Scott Well, of course that would be nice... but you can't have everything you want.. so lets learn to settle for what we have - a decent, hardworking, team-centered player. He is a defensive bowler who bowls the way he does because a) he is asked to, and b) because he knows his limits. Not much of a case, but there you go! |
|
27-04-2004, 07:16 PM
in reply to Richie Benauds Love Child's post starting "To paraphrase the cricket authority..." | ||||
| ||||
| RBLC LOL!! very quick! But just think, if Giles never played test cricket again, Vaughan would get home sick without his bestest friend, and wouldn't be able to play in the winter tours... |
|
27-04-2004, 07:22 PM
in reply to Kirsty Harris's post starting "RBLC
LOL!! very quick! But just think,..." | ||||
| ||||
| He could always take a gameboy rather than a gim......no in the interests of decency I'll leave it be. On a slightly different note, I'd pick someone who was crap at cards for the next ODI team away from home because thats all we're doing at the moment ! |
|
27-04-2004, 07:30 PM
in reply to Richie Benauds Love Child's post starting "He could always take a gameboy rather..." | ||||
| ||||
| RBLC You wouldn't belive that in grotty old England, we had a beautiful weekend,while in the WI it was ****ing it down non-stop! Perhaps we should offer to host the remaining games... P.s - I think it was a good idea that you cut yourself off where you did, given my profession, I may well have taken issue with it! |
|
27-04-2004, 07:37 PM
in reply to Kirsty Harris's post starting "RBLC
You wouldn't belive that in..." | ||||
| ||||
| You didnt know what I was going to type ! |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Linear Mode
