Hide/show banner
Fantasy Cricket

Welcome to the World-A-Team Cricket Forum. We promote friendly, good-natured, quality cricket discussion.
Go Back   World A-Team Cricket Forum > England Cricket Forum > ENG Archived Threads 2004
Sitemap Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Contact Us Chat Room Shoutbox News Podcasts Fantasy Cricket

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61 (permalink)  
Old 05-05-2004, 09:49 PM in reply to Tom Partis's post starting "great effort to get the result. well..."
Scott-Wozniak Scott-Wozniak is offline
(PAK-captain) Passed Wasim Bari's 1366 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Surrey
My other team/s: England and Surrey
Posts: 1,383
Congratulations to England on winning this ODI, and they deserved to win it. They bowled well, fielded well, pegged the WI back to an achievable score, Tresco got them off to a great start and the the rest of the batsman just continued on with his good work.

Kirsty, do the bowlers still look tired and the middle order weak?

Scott
  #62 (permalink)  
Old 05-05-2004, 10:14 PM in reply to Scott-Wozniak's post starting "Congratulations to England on winning..."
Rachael Rachael is offline
Administrator
WAT selector
Selector-World XI (1980 onwards)
(ENG-captain) Passed Mike Atherton's 7728 Test runs
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Norfolk
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
Posts: 7,835
I noticed the following in an earlier post: "A great combination from Gough and Read to get Smith out: Read right up to the stumps had Smith playing much more circumspectly, then Gough slips in the length ball, Smith plays across the line and is given lbw."

Having been out and about, away from both radio and TV... I missed this... and can't find any text-commentary: can anyone fill me in? Read standing up to Gough sounds awesome... was he doing this consistently? How well did it work?

Intrigued!
  #63 (permalink)  
Old 05-05-2004, 10:38 PM in reply to Rachael's post starting "I noticed the following in an earlier..."
sostenurter sostenurter is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 284
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rachael
I noticed the following in an earlier post: "A great combination from Gough and Read to get Smith out: Read right up to the stumps had Smith playing much more circumspectly, then Gough slips in the length ball, Smith plays across the line and is given lbw."

Having been out and about, away from both radio and TV... I missed this... and can't find any text-commentary: can anyone fill me in? Read standing up to Gough sounds awesome... was he doing this consistently? How well did it work?

Intrigued!
Don't know about that, but Read took a brilliant catch off Clarke to dismiss Lara. It was especally heartening to see him do that, because one of the only faults anyone has been able to find with his keeping was his tendency to view his catching circle as too narrow - Trescothick was taking a lot of catches on Read's side in the Test matches. But there was no slip in place for Lara in this match and Read had to dive full length to catch it. All credit to him.
  #64 (permalink)  
Old 05-05-2004, 10:41 PM in reply to Rachael's post starting "I noticed the following in an earlier..."
Scott-Wozniak Scott-Wozniak is offline
(PAK-captain) Passed Wasim Bari's 1366 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Surrey
My other team/s: England and Surrey
Posts: 1,383
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rachael
Having been out and about, away from both radio and TV... I missed this... and can't find any text-commentary: can anyone fill me in? Read standing up to Gough sounds awesome... was he doing this consistently? How well did it work?
I was watching but I have to say I wasn't really aware of Read standing up to the stumps, all I can recall was that perhaps Read moved closer to the stumps at the same time Gough was pitching the ball up bit more. From what I remember Smith tried to on-drive a ball off the back foot that was well pitched up, played across the line and was out LBW.

Scott
  #65 (permalink)  
Old 05-05-2004, 11:25 PM in reply to Scott-Wozniak's post starting "I was watching but I have to say I..."
Whips_off_the_bails's Avatar
Whips_off_the_bails Whips_off_the_bails is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 479
Sorry if my message was confusing . Read was standing up to the slower pace of Clarke in the previous over. This got Smith tied down to the extent that he tried to hit Gough across the line in the next over.

Goughie has lost some pace, but the wicket-keeper doesn't stand up to the wicket when he's bowling quite yet. Goughie got up to 85 mph at times in this game.
  #66 (permalink)  
Old 05-05-2004, 11:28 PM in reply to sostenurter's post starting "Don't know about that, but Read took a..."
Whips_off_the_bails's Avatar
Whips_off_the_bails Whips_off_the_bails is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 479
Quote:
Originally Posted by sostenurter
Don't know about that, but Read took a brilliant catch off Clarke to dismiss Lara. It was especally heartening to see him do that, because one of the only faults anyone has been able to find with his keeping was his tendency to view his catching circle as too narrow - Trescothick was taking a lot of catches on Read's side in the Test matches. But there was no slip in place for Lara in this match and Read had to dive full length to catch it. All credit to him.
I would say that that catch won England the match, although Sarwan's innings made sure WI posted a competitive total. Read justified his selection in this series both behind the stumps and with the bat. He scored at a run a ball in each of his innings and hit some big shots when he had to.
  #67 (permalink)  
Old 06-05-2004, 12:07 AM in reply to Whips_off_the_bails's post starting "I would say that that catch won England..."
sostenurter sostenurter is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 284
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whips_off_the_bails
I would say that that catch won England the match, although Sarwan's innings made sure WI posted a competitive total. Read justified his selection in this series both behind the stumps and with the bat. He scored at a run a ball in each of his innings and hit some big shots when he had to.
It was a great catch, and he had a very good series. Still wouldn't bring him back for the Tests, though!
  #68 (permalink)  
Old 06-05-2004, 07:03 AM in reply to Whips_off_the_bails's post starting "Sorry if my message was confusing . ..."
Rachael Rachael is offline
Administrator
WAT selector
Selector-World XI (1980 onwards)
(ENG-captain) Passed Mike Atherton's 7728 Test runs
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Norfolk
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
Posts: 7,835
Thanks for all the replies guys: thought it was too good to be true. It has to be the way to go with Goughie though: the guy has a repertoire of deliveries that is pretty well unrivalled in English (perhaps even world) cricket... and whilst he can clearly manage with pace and swing on the right track (somewhere like Edgebaston in May) I'm sure he (and maybe also Anderson) could do better working with Read stood up on slower, lower, dryer, dustier tracks that are more normally offered as ODI strips.

Read stood up to Clarke though: now there's a real surprise. This is the same Clarke who was the faster net bowler England had this winter.. consistently breaking the 90 mph barrier... and with none of the guile and variation that might be expected to make standing up to him seriously effective.

Curious!
  #69 (permalink)  
Old 06-05-2004, 07:20 AM in reply to Rachael's post starting "Thanks for all the replies guys:..."
Mike_Hock Mike_Hock is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: South Wales
My other team/s: England & Glamorgan
Posts: 394
Send a message via MSN to Mike_Hock
Clarke breaking 90mph? Really?
  #70 (permalink)  
Old 06-05-2004, 07:35 AM in reply to Mike_Hock's post starting "Clarke breaking 90mph? Really?"
Rachael Rachael is offline
Administrator
WAT selector
Selector-World XI (1980 onwards)
(ENG-captain) Passed Mike Atherton's 7728 Test runs
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Norfolk
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
Posts: 7,835
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike_Hock
Clarke breaking 90mph? Really?
Yup. Does bugger all with it (no sideways movement, little variation, and for all I know, consistently in the wrong areas) but he IS mighty quick.

I was very much on the guy's case until I realised just how young he is: why the hell should he be Thorpe-like with the bat and Gough-like with the ball when he's barely started playing cricket?

I'm not going to shed tears if he disappears without trace.. and I'd much rather see any of a dozen other players really prosper.... but if Troy C can work his miracles on the bowling front (to the point where Surrey will at least consider giving him the ball occasionally)... then as a 5 bowler who bats a bit (not got great hopes on that front: power-house not class act) he could be right for pitches where we want 5 seamers.

Just as long as he isn't let near the Test team again: that I really DO want to avoid seeing!
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 03:54 AM.

Page generated in 0.495 seconds (66.75% PHP - 33.25% MySQL) with 13 queries

Partner Sites: - pakistancricketzone.com | Fantasy Cricket | Cricket World Cup Images | Cricket 24/7 | Third Umpire | Indian Cricket League

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0