Hide/show banner
Fantasy Cricket

Welcome to the World-A-Team Cricket Forum. We promote friendly, good-natured, quality cricket discussion.
Go Back   World A-Team Cricket Forum > England Cricket Forum > ENG Archived Threads 2004
Sitemap Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Contact Us Chat Room Shoutbox News Podcasts Fantasy Cricket

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51 (permalink)  
Old 20-05-2004, 08:44 PM in reply to Ernest's post "Scott-Wozniac"
Scott-Wozniak Scott-Wozniak is offline
(PAK-captain) Passed Wasim Bari's 1366 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Surrey
My other team/s: England and Surrey
Posts: 1,382
Quote:
Originally Posted by ernest
Hoggard is the pits,when the ball does not swing,Anderson would have been more penetrating I think,Did you watch the match,Harmison seemed stragely subdude,not a lot of fire.
kiwis rode their luck,if they swing the bat like that tomorrow they will soon be gone.
Evening Ernest

Yes I did see the match, apart from dozing off in the last session, but woke up just in time to see the cause of my dozing to be trapped LBW.

Not so sure about Anderson being more penetrating - Anderson relies on swing just as much as Hoggy does, if its not swinging for Hoggy, I can't see Anderson doing any better.

England bowled very poorly today all of them pretty much, with the possible exception of Freddy - but he wasn't bowled enough. What was needed on this pitch was 'metronomic' line and length and accurate bowling on or about off stump - giving the batsmen NOTHING, and if they want to score runs they have to take a risk. What we got was wayward line, varying length and poor accuracy and that is reflected in the score. England failed to exert hardly any pressure for any length of time - they picked up a couple of wickets due to pressure - but the others were mistakes by the batsmen. Unless England get their sh*t together and put in a decent bowling performance tommorow I fully expect them to be looking down the barrel of a 5-600+ score. And if that happens, kiss your @ss goodbye to England winning this match.

I wouldn't bank on the Kiwi's swinging the bat and throwing their wickets away, they're not West Indies - England have to earn those wickets by good bowling, and if they don't get them out quickly tommorow we're in for a repeat of the last Test in the Carribbean.

Very dissapointed.

Scott
  #52 (permalink)  
Old 20-05-2004, 08:54 PM in reply to Scott-Wozniak's post starting "Evening Ernest Yes I did see the..."
Mike_Hock Mike_Hock is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: South Wales
My other team/s: England & Glamorgan
Posts: 394
Send a message via MSN to Mike_Hock
I think Jones bowled well today. He looked as potent as Freddy and went past the edge on a few occasions.
  #53 (permalink)  
Old 20-05-2004, 08:56 PM in reply to Scott-Wozniak's post starting "Evening Ernest Yes I did see the..."
Statto Statto is offline
WAT selector - England A 2005
(AUS) Passed Jeff Thomson's 679 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Stockport
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Stockport CC, Lancashire
Posts: 686
Send a message via MSN to Statto
we always seem scared to bowl freddie in case he gets injured even when, like today he was the best bowler. It seems stupid to be playing someone as the 4th seamer if he can only bowl a couple of shortish spells for fear of injury. I dont know whether its his or the captain/managements confidence (or lack of) in his health or that he simply isnt capable of long spells, which i very much doubt, but either way it does england no favours when he should be bowling but isnt given the ball. i cant see it being freddies attitude as he always seems to give everything for his team whatever else is happening around him. At times like today when no one else is stepping up (except jones this morning) it can cost us big time
  #54 (permalink)  
Old 20-05-2004, 08:59 PM in reply to Scott-Wozniak's post starting "Evening Ernest Yes I did see the..."
Ernest's Avatar
Ernest Ernest is offline
Administrator
WAT England A Selector
Selector-World XI (1980 onwards)
(WI-captain) Passed Brian Lara's 11953 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Lancashire
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
My other team/s: ::All "Test" Playing Nations
Posts: 13,605
Send a message via Yahoo to Ernest Send a message via Skype™ to Ernest
Scott-Wozniak

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott-Wozniak

Not so sure about Anderson being more penetrating - Anderson relies on swing just as much as Hoggy does, if its not swinging for Hoggy, I can't see Anderson doing any better.


I wouldn't bank on the Kiwi's swinging the bat and throwing their wickets away, they're not West Indies - England have to earn those wickets by good bowling, and if they don't get them out quickly tommorow we're in for a repeat of the last Test in the Carribbean.

Very dissapointed.

Scott
Scott,Dont even remind me of that last Test in the Carribean,surely it couldnt happen again.

I dont blame you for being very dissapointed,and I totaly agree,accurate bowling giving nothing away,was what was needed,let them get themselves out.I agree 99% obout Anderson,but at times even when he is bowling crap he can get one out of the blue,I think that is because he is smaller than most,

Annother Freddy,and annother Jones,we really needed,they where the pick.

Looking forward to the batting,(tomorrow I hope)

Ernest



there seemed to be a lack of something,cant quite put my finger on it.
  #55 (permalink)  
Old 20-05-2004, 09:02 PM in reply to Ernest's post "Scott-Wozniak"
Mike_Hock Mike_Hock is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: South Wales
My other team/s: England & Glamorgan
Posts: 394
Send a message via MSN to Mike_Hock
I think they lacked a bit of consistency, especially Hoggard and Harmison.
  #56 (permalink)  
Old 20-05-2004, 09:02 PM in reply to Ernest's post "Scott-Wozniak"
Scott-Wozniak Scott-Wozniak is offline
(PAK-captain) Passed Wasim Bari's 1366 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Surrey
My other team/s: England and Surrey
Posts: 1,382
Quote:
Originally Posted by ernest
there seemed to be a lack of something,cant quite put my finger on it.
I think you'll find its called 'line and length'

Scott
  #57 (permalink)  
Old 20-05-2004, 09:02 PM in reply to Scott-Wozniak's post starting "Evening Ernest Yes I did see the..."
sostenurter sostenurter is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 284
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott-Wozniak
Evening Ernest

Yes I did see the match, apart from dozing off in the last session, but woke up just in time to see the cause of my dozing to be trapped LBW.

Not so sure about Anderson being more penetrating - Anderson relies on swing just as much as Hoggy does, if its not swinging for Hoggy, I can't see Anderson doing any better.

England bowled very poorly today all of them pretty much, with the possible exception of Freddy - but he wasn't bowled enough. What was needed on this pitch was 'metronomic' line and length and accurate bowling on or about off stump - giving the batsmen NOTHING, and if they want to score runs they have to take a risk. What we got was wayward line, varying length and poor accuracy and that is reflected in the score. England failed to exert hardly any pressure for any length of time - they picked up a couple of wickets due to pressure - but the others were mistakes by the batsmen. Unless England get their sh*t together and put in a decent bowling performance tommorow I fully expect them to be looking down the barrel of a 5-600+ score. And if that happens, kiss your @ss goodbye to England winning this match.

I wouldn't bank on the Kiwi's swinging the bat and throwing their wickets away, they're not West Indies - England have to earn those wickets by good bowling, and if they don't get them out quickly tommorow we're in for a repeat of the last Test in the Carribbean.

Very dissapointed.

Scott
hmmm. I too am disappointed, but bear in mind that all the England bowlers, especially Harmison, have been known to improve drastically within a match. Hopefully, Cooley and Fletcher have told them what's what and they'll come out in the morning bowling a lot better.

I thought Simon Jones didn't do too badly either - OK he was wayward towards the end, but he was also threatening, and at the beginning of the innings, along with Flintoff, he succeeded in keeping it tight.
  #58 (permalink)  
Old 20-05-2004, 09:14 PM in reply to Mike_Hock's post starting "I think they lacked a bit of..."
Ernest's Avatar
Ernest Ernest is offline
Administrator
WAT England A Selector
Selector-World XI (1980 onwards)
(WI-captain) Passed Brian Lara's 11953 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Lancashire
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
My other team/s: ::All "Test" Playing Nations
Posts: 13,605
Send a message via Yahoo to Ernest Send a message via Skype™ to Ernest
Mike-Hock

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike_Hock
I think they lacked a bit of consistency, especially Hoggard and Harmison.
Mike
dissapointing was'nt it,Scott reckons if they dont bowl tighter tomorrow,we are going to see a repeat of the 4th test in the Windies,God Forbid,and the more I think about it the more I agree.

You had the two bowlers banged to rights Mike,but what about Giles???

Last edited by Ernest : 20-05-2004 at 09:18 PM.
  #59 (permalink)  
Old 20-05-2004, 10:07 PM in reply to sostenurter's post starting "hmmm. I too am disappointed, but bear..."
Scott-Wozniak Scott-Wozniak is offline
(PAK-captain) Passed Wasim Bari's 1366 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Surrey
My other team/s: England and Surrey
Posts: 1,382
Quote:
Originally Posted by sostenurter
hmmm. I too am disappointed, but bear in mind that all the England bowlers, especially Harmison, have been known to improve drastically within a match. Hopefully, Cooley and Fletcher have told them what's what and they'll come out in the morning bowling a lot better.
sostenurter

Yes I know what you're saying, but in my mind the damage has been done, it's damage limitation now - Cairns is yet to come in and he can take any attack apart. This is the big problem with this Kiwi side - their batting is incredibly long and England need to be on the top of their bowling game to keep this first innings total to something manageable. What always worries me is our batting is so inconsistent - will they even get to the Kiwi's first innings score?

Quote:
Originally Posted by sostenurter
I thought Simon Jones didn't do too badly either - OK he was wayward towards the end, but he was also threatening, and at the beginning of the innings, along with Flintoff, he succeeded in keeping it tight.
Yes Jones wasn't too bad - but wasn't consistent enough with his line and length like all the other English bowlers.

I said it before the series started - England need to bowl these Kiwi's out cheaply if they hope to win these games, if this first day is anything to go by they're in for a lot of work.

Scott
  #60 (permalink)  
Old 20-05-2004, 10:42 PM in reply to Ernest's post "Scott-Wozniak"
R W S's Avatar
R W S R W S is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
Posts: 1,279
Cool Captain Fantastic

Quote:
Originally Posted by ernest
there seemed to be a lack of something,cant quite put my finger on it.
Virgil maybe?
__________________

 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 01:40 PM.

Page generated in 0.593 seconds (64.92% PHP - 35.08% MySQL) with 13 queries

Partner Sites: - pakistancricketzone.com | Fantasy Cricket | Cricket World Cup Images | Cricket 24/7 | Third Umpire | Indian Cricket League

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0