| | |
| | |
| Welcome to the World-A-Team Cricket Forum. We promote friendly, good-natured, quality cricket discussion. |
| |||||||
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
08-01-2005, 11:50 AM
in reply to Rahul_Dravid_is_No.1's post starting "hehe that was goin too far. it is too..." | ||||
| ||||
| His height and bounce will scare the crap out of Indian players. He has not bowled well in this series. Right off his threat at your peril. Quote:
 Last edited by flanflinger : 08-01-2005 at 11:53 AM. |
|
08-01-2005, 03:17 PM
in reply to flanflinger's post starting "His height and bounce will scare the..." | |||
| |||
| ok. we will have to wait and see. speaking of that, when do india and england play a test series again??? we havn't played test matches against each other since 2001 or something isnt it? when we came to england. i would to see us two play more test matches against each other. that would be class |
|
08-01-2005, 03:38 PM
in reply to Rahul_Dravid_is_No.1's post starting "ok. we will have to wait and see.
..." | |||
| |||
| India are hosting England in February 2006 according to the ICC future tours programme, but I'm not sure what the detailed programme is.
__________________ Money won't buy you friends. But it gets you a better class of enemy. Spike Milligan |
|
08-01-2005, 06:12 PM
in reply to Occasional Fan's post starting "India are hosting England in February..." | |||
| |||
  next year. that is too long! we need to play england more often |
| |||
| I also tend to think on the same lines, and I also think it is about time other cricket board started giving us five test series - I've just finished viewing our intenary for our tour to Carribean and much to my digust they have again given us just 2 test and worse still the one-day series (3 matches) comes before the test series. I hate these type of schedules. |
| |||
| well first you need to define the word chuck dont you? chuck has been defined by the ICC in the rules but on scientific analysis it turns out their defination and the rules that were set are not humanly possible and need to be changed to be realistic! so according to the new and REALISTIC rules i doubt flintoff and and harmison chuck. and peter reobuck must be saying they chuck based on what he sees with his eyes, im guessing. and akhtar has that hyperextension to make him SEEM like he is chucking |
|
08-01-2005, 07:43 PM
in reply to Rahul_Dravid_is_No.1's post starting "well first you need to define the word..." | |||
| |||
| Rahul Dravid, Some how I don't think mentioning Peter Roebuck was appropriate for this thread or any thread, I'm not doing a new thread on it, although, if you are interested, you might want to read a previous thread here where we have had a discussion on it - you can also read see this link for reading the particular article where Roebuck asks questions about Freddie's action. Sorry. Cheers! |
| |||
| cool. thanks for the links Zainub  |
|
08-01-2005, 08:14 PM
in reply to Rahul_Dravid_is_No.1's post starting "cool. thanks for the links Zainub:)" | |||
| |||
| You're most welcome, no problems |
|
08-01-2005, 08:23 PM
in reply to Zainub's post starting "I also tend to think on the same lines,..." | |||
| |||
| Quote:
i hope india do play england more and they should be very good matches. maybe zaheer can get his century too  |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Linear Mode
